##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

ID Achmad Zain Avicena ID Muchammad Helmi Umam

Abstract





This study examines the genealogy of “digital zuhud” as a response to the attention economy that exploits individual subjectivity in the contemporary digital ecosystem. The main focus of the study is directed at the dialectic between Michel Foucault's concept of technologies of the self and the practice of muraqabah in the tradition of Islamic spirituality. Using a descriptive-analytical qualitative design with a literature study approach, this study analyzes the primary texts Technologies of the Self and Al-Ri'ayah through a philosophical parallelism method. The findings show that muraqabah functions as a transcendent mechanism that builds spiritual resilience to counter neoliberal alienation and self-quantification. Digital zuhud is formulated as a reconstructive framework for hybrid subjectivity to maintain moral agency amid algorithmic control. This study contributes to enriching the Foucaultian discourse with Eastern spiritual dimensions, while bridging the gap between Western technological ethics and Islamic tradition. The practical implications include guidelines for designing technologies that support ethical self-care. Future research is recommended to conduct empirical testing to validate the effectiveness of digital zuhud on a broader user population.





Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Achmad Zain Avicena, & Muchammad Helmi Umam. (2026). The Genealogy of Digital Asceticism in the Vortex of the Attention Economy: The Dialectic of Technologies of the Self and Muraqabah. Journal of Islamic Civilization, 7(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.33086/jic.v7i2.8457
Section
Articles
Technologies of the self; muraqabah; attention economy; digital zuhud; subjectivity

References

Al-Muhasibi, A.-H. (1968). Al-Ri`ayah li Huquq Allah (A. Q. Ahmad Atha, Ed.). Dar al-Kutub al-`Ilmiyah.

Alshamy, Y. (2025). Mind the cultural gap: Cultural contingency of behavioral interventions. Mind and Society, 24(2), 739–752. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-025-00339-8

Black, N. (2019). ‘Technologies of the self’– : Bridging academic theory and practice-based research through Creative Documentary Enquiry. Media Practice and Education, 20(2), 179–193. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741136.2019.1614358

Boccia Artieri, G. (2021). Networked Participation: , Selfie Protest, and Ephemeral Public Spheres. In D. Della Ratta, G. Lovink, T. Numerico, & P. Sarram ( (Eds.)), Aesthetics and Politics of the Online Self ( pp.. 331–356). International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65497-9_21

Burkitt, I. (2002). Technologies of the self: Habitus and capacities. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 32(2), 219–237. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00184

Cahill, H. (2012). Form and governance: Considering the drama as a ‘technology of the self’’. Research in Drama Education, 17(3), 405–424. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2012.701444

Clark, M., Southerton, C., & Driller, M. (2024). Digital self-tracking, habits and the myth of discontinuance: It doesn’t just ‘stop’. New Media & Society, 26 (4), 2168–2188. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221083992

Dorrestijn, S. (2012). Technical mediation and subjectivation: Tracing and extending Foucault’s philosophy of technology. Philosophy and Technology, 25(2), 221–241. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-011-0057-0

Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the Self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.) ( ), of the Self ( pp.. 16–49). of Massachusetts Press.

Friesen, N. (2017). Confessional technologies of the self: From Seneca to social media. First Monday, 22(6). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i6.6750

: Guo, D.-Y. (2015). Undergraduates’’ technologies of the self: An inventory and taxonomy. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 60(3), 27–62. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(3).02

Jain, V., Belk, R. W., Ambika, A., & Pathak-Shelat, M. (2021). Narratives of the self in the digital world: An empirical investigation. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 20(2), 368–380. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1869

Laszlo, E. (1973). A systems philosophy of human values. Behavioral Science, 18(4), 250–259. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830180404

Lenhard, J. (2024). Autonomy and Automation. Synthesis Philosophica, 39(1), 31–45. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp39102

Lobb, A. (2015). Technologies of the Other: Renewing ‘ empathy’ between Foucault and psychoanalysis. Foucault Studies, (20), 218–235. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i0.4938

Markula, P. (2004). ‘Tuning into one’s self:’ Foucault’s technologies of the self and mindful fitness. Sociology of Sport Journal, 21(3), 302–321. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.21.3.302

Meriluoto, T. (2023). The self in selfies— Conceptualizing the selfie-coordination of marginalized youth with sociology of engagements. British Journal of Sociology, 74(4), 638–656. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.13015

Mitcheson, K. (2012). Foucault’s Technologies of the Self: : Between Control and Creativity. . Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 43 (1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2012.11006757

Nikolakakis, N. V. (2024). Tracing the Self: : Foucault’s Genealogy and the Evolution of Subjectivity from Ancient Practices to Digital Frontiers.. and Politics Journal, (1(25)), 7–28. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.36169/2227-6068.2024.01.00001

Pylypa, J. (1998). Power and bodily practice: Applying the work of Foucault to an anthropology of the body. https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/110194

Ramon, R. (2020). Pedagogical visual narratives of identity reconstruction. Artseduca, (28), 52–67. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.6035/ARTSEDUCA.2021.28.4

Schneider, A., & Gerdenitsch, C. (2025). Unpacking the Tensions of Empowerment in Digital-Self Tracking: A Digital Humanism Perspective. 16319 LNCS, 537–543. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-11108-1_41

Sheth, J. N., & Solomon, M. R. (2014). Extending the Extended Self in a Digital World. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 22 (2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679220201

Tavani, E. (2024). The Selfie and the Low-Resolution Self: Beyond Foucault’s Technologies of the Self. Itinera, (28), 19–33. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.54103/2039-9251/27832

Wright, D. (2000). Drama Education: A ‘self-organizing system’ in pursuit of learning. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 5 (1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/135697800114177

Achmad Zain Avicena, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia

Muchammad Helmi Umam, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.