COMPARISON OF GLUCOSE REDUCTION IN URINE USING BENEDICT METHOD HEATED BY METHYLATED FLAME WITH 100°C WATERBATH

  • Fitri Fadhilah Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Sekolah Tinggi Analis Bakti Asih, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Noviana Vanawati Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Sekolah Tinggi Analis Bakti Asih, Bandung, Indonesia
Keywords: Urine reduction, glucose, benedict, methylated flame, waterbath

Abstract

The high prevalence of Diabetes Melitus (DM) is a global problem that must be solved by health workers around the world. This study aims to determine the differences in the results of urine reduction examination using benedict method heated by spirtus flame and waterbath 100°C. This research method is a laboratory experiment. The results of this study indicated that the urine reduction examination by heating methylated flame and waterbath 100oC shows the same results from negative (-) until positive (+4). Examination of urine reduction by heating the methylated flame and waterbath 100oC did not affect the results. However, there are a difference in the process of urine reduction examination by heating flame which was need a longer time up to 3-5 minutes. Additionally, the solution in the tube could be exploded. It was also time consuming which could only carry out one by one sample. Meanwhile, the heating of urine by using 100oC waterbath is relatively faster, which only took 2 minutes. The urine was not also exploded when it was boiled and the heating process could perform 6-8 samples at the same time (depending on the tube rack). In conclusion, the heating method of urine by using waterbath was better than spirtus (methanol) flame since it could carry out large sample in one time and it was safer for the laboratory personnel.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bourey RE, Kaw MK, Lester SG, Ghanem SS, Najjar SM. Diabetes. In: Diet, Exercise, and Chronic Disease: The Biological Basis of Prevention. 2014.

Of D, Mellitus D. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2014.

Forouhi NG, Wareham NJ. Epidemiology of diabetes. Medicine (United Kingdom). 2019.

Egan AM, Dinneen SF. What is diabetes? Medicine (United Kingdom). 2019.

Lankelma J, Nie Z, Carrilho E, Whitesides GM. Analysis of Glucose in Urine. Anal Chem. 2012.

Andrade JAM, Kang HC, Greffin S, Garcia Rosa ML, Lugon JR. Serum uric acid and disorders of glucose metabolism: The role of glycosuria. Brazilian J Med Biol Res. 2014.

Olagbuji BN, Atiba AS, Olofinbiyi BA, Akintayo AA, Awoleke JO, Ade-Ojo IP, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for gestational diabetes using 1999, 2013 WHO and IADPSG criteria upon implementation of a universal one-step screening and diagnostic strategy in a sub-Saharan African population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015.

Ricchiuti V. Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry. Am J Clin Pathol. 2016.

James CA, Richardson AJ, Watt PW, Maxwell NS. Reliability and validity of skin temperature measurement by telemetry thermistors and a thermal camera during exercise in the heat. J Therm Biol. 2014.

Bishop M, Fody E, Schoeff L. Clinical Chemistry - Techniques, Principles, Correlations [Internet]. Techniques, Principles, Correlations. 2010. 1-788 p. Available from: papers3://publication/uuid/AC48E5E0-8278-4589-88E8-EF544B4DA818

Ottosson-Laakso E, Tuomi T, Forsén B, Gullström M, Groop PH, Groop L, et al. Influence of familial renal glycosuria due to mutations in the SLC5A2 gene on changes in glucose tolerance over time. PLoS One. 2016.

Gupta Y, Kalra S. Screening for diabetes. J Pak Med Assoc. 2015.

Pippitt K, Li M, Gurgle HE. Diabetes mellitus: Screening and diagnosis. Am Fam Physician. 2016.

Clarke SF, Foster JR. A history of blood glucose meters and their role in self-monitoring of diabetes mellitus. British Journal of Biomedical Science. 2012.

Published
2019-10-18
How to Cite
Fadhilah, F., & Vanawati, N. (2019). COMPARISON OF GLUCOSE REDUCTION IN URINE USING BENEDICT METHOD HEATED BY METHYLATED FLAME WITH 100°C WATERBATH. Indonesian Journal of Medical Laboratory Science and Technology, 1(2), 44-51. https://doi.org/10.33086/ijmlst.v1i2.1075