Ticking Boxes or Making a Difference? The Real Impact of Monitoring Community Projects of Poverty Alleviation
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
PERCY DIPELA
Abstract
Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) are central to community development projects, typically couched as necessary for accountability, learning, and measuring impact. There is a widespread suspicion that monitoring too often benefits bureaucracy more than meaningful social change. This article considers the tension between compliance-oriented monitoring and transformative effects. Based on critical literature and empirical data, it asks whether existing M&E practice can be disproportionately donor-focused and data-driven at the expense of community empowerment and learning. It contends that monitoring is necessary, but its worth depends on its design and implementation. The article invites a move towards participatory, context-sensitive monitoring practice focused on local relevance, learning, and long-term effects rather than box-ticking rituals.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Copyright (c) 2025 PERCY DIPELA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Amin, H., Scheepers, H., & Malik, M. (2023). Project monitoring and evaluation to engage stakeholders of international development projects for community impact. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 16(2), 405-427.
Bakewell, O., & Garbutt, A. (2005). The Use and Abuse of the Logical Framework Approach. SIDA.
Bamberger, M. (2012). Introduction to mixed methods in impact evaluation. Interaction.
Cimdins, R., & Skinkis, P. (2011). Development policy monitoring issues—regional and local experiences in Riga Region. European Integration Studies, (5), 14-19.
Clements, P., Chianca, T., & Sasaki, R. (2008). Reducing world poverty by improving the evaluation of development aid. American journal of evaluation, 29(2), 195–214.
Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (Eds.). (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? Zed Books.
Cornwall, A. (2000). Making a Difference? Gender and Participatory Development. IDS Discussion Paper 378.
Cornwall, A. (2007). Buzzwords and fuzzwords: Deconstructing development discourse. Development in Practice, 17(4–5), 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520701469302
Cornwall, A., & Coelho, V. S. P. (Eds.). (2007). Spaces for change? The politics of citizen participation in new democratic arenas. Zed Books.
Engela, R., & Ajam, T. (2010). Implementing a government-wide monitoring and evaluation system in South Africa. World Bank Publications-—Books.
Eyben, R. (2013). International aid and the making of a better world: Reflexive practice. Routledge.
Eyben, R. (2013). Uncovering the Politics of ‘Evidence’ and ‘Results’: A Framing Paper for Development Practitioners. Center for Development Impact.
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.
Guijt, I. (2008). Seeking surprise: Rethinking monitoring for collective learning in rural resource management. PhD thesis, Wageningen University.
Guijt, I. (2014). Participatory Approaches to Monitoring and Evaluation. In Roche, C., & Jacobs, B. (eds). A Guide to Monitoring and Evaluation for NGOs.
Hatry, H. P. (2006). Performance measurement: Getting results (2nd ed.). Urban Institute Press.
Hutto, R. L., & Belote, R. T. (2013). Distinguishing four types of monitoring based on the questions they address. Forest Ecology and Management, 289, 183-189.
Iddi, B., & Nuhu, S. (2018). Challenges and opportunities for community participation in monitoring and evaluating government projects in Tanzania: Case of TASAF II, Bagamoyo District. Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 2(1), 1-10.
Kusek, J. Z., & Rist, R. C. (2004). Ten steps to a results-based monitoring and evaluation system: a handbook for development practitioners. World Bank Publications.
Li, T. M. (2007). The will to improve: governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Duke University Press.
Miller, P., & Rose, N. (2008). Governing the present: Administering economic, social, and personal life. Polity Press.
Mosse, D. (2005). Cultivating Development: An Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice. Pluto Press.
Naidoo, I. A. (2011). Management challenges in M&E: thoughts from South Africa. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 25(3), 103-114.
Ostašius, E., & Laukaitis, A. (2015). Reference model for e-government monitoring, evaluation, and benchmarking. Engineering Economics, 26(3), 255-263.
Patton, M. Q. (2011). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. Guilford Press.
Podems, D., Goldman, I., & Jacob, C. (2014). Evaluator competencies: the South African government experience. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 28(3), 71-85.
Ramalingam, B., Laric, M., & Primrose, J. (2013). From Best Practice to Best Fit: Understanding and Navigating Wicked Problems in International Development. Overseas Development Institute.
Rogers, P. (2014). Theory of change. Methodological briefs: Impact evaluation no. 2. UNICEF Office of Research.
Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. Yale University Press.
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367.
Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.5.567.7810
Wallace, T. (2006). The aid chain: Coercion and commitment in development NGOs. ITDG Publishing.
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553.
World Bank. (2011). Monitoring and Evaluation: Some Tools, Methods, and Approaches. World Bank.