Publication Ethics

1.

Article Standaritation:

The author presents an accurate community service report about the activities that have been carried out. The underlying data must be explained clearly, in detail in the community service article. Articles should also contain sufficient detail and references to allow others to cite the work. Articles containing fraudulent or intentionally inaccurate data are unethical and unacceptable behaviour.

2. 

Retention and Author's Access:

Authors must prepare and provide raw data for editorial purposes upon request within a predetermined period of time

3.

Orisinalitas dan Plagiasi:

The author must ensure that the work written is original and if the author uses another person's work and/or sentences, it must use citations or be quoted correctly.

4.

Multiple publishing or similar content:

Authors should not publish the same manuscript in more than one journal or publisher. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal at the same time constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

5.

Source of Acknowledgment:

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others should always be given. Authors should cite publications or ideas that were influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

6. 

Preparation of reports:

The names of the listed authors should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the concept, design, conduct, or interpretation of the reported research. Everyone who has contributed significantly must be listed as a co-author. Parties who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project must be recognized or listed as contributors. The lead author must ensure that the co-authors whose names are included in the manuscript are those who are eligible for inclusion, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the report and have agreed to publish the report.

7.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest:

All authors must disclose in the manuscript any financial or substantive conflicts of interest that may be expected to influence the results or interpretation of the manuscript.

8.

Fundamental errors in published works:

When the author finds significant errors or inaccuracies in the published work, the author is obliged to immediately notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the work.

9.

Risk and Humans or Animals as Subjects:

If the research involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have a high risk of use, the authors must mention this in the full paper

 Editorial Workshet

1.

Principles of Justice:

Editors always evaluate the intellectual content of manuscripts regardless of the race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnicity, nationality, or political philosophy of the authors.

2.

Confidentiality:

Editors and any editorial staff are prohibited from disclosing any information about submitted manuscripts to anyone other than the authors, reviewers, potential reviewers, editorial advisors and publishers.

3.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest:

Unpublished material that is mentioned in a submitted manuscript may not be used in the editor's personal research without the written consent of the author.

4.

Publication Decision:

The journal's editorial board is responsible for deciding which articles to publish. Editors are subject to the discretion of the journal's editorial board and are limited by legal provisions such as defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. Editors can consult with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

5.

Manuscript Review:

Editors must ensure that each initial manuscript has been evaluated by the editor for originality. Editors must regulate and use peer review fairly and wisely. Editors must describe the peer review process for informing authors and indicate which sections of the journal were reviewed. Editors must use appropriate peer reviewers for manuscripts to be published by selecting people with sufficient expertise and avoiding people with conflicts of interest.

Reviewer Worksheet

1.

Contribution to Editorial Decisions:

Peer review assists editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communication with authors can also assist authors in improving the quality of manuscripts.

2.

Accuracy:

Any reviewer who is selected but feels unqualified to review the research reported in the manuscript or knows that an immediate review is impossible should notify the editor and withdraw from the review process.

3.

Objectivity Standard:

Review must be done objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewers must express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

4. 

Confidentiality:

Any manuscript accepted for review must be a confidential document. Manuscripts may not be displayed or discussed with others unless authorized by the editor.

5. 

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest:

Important information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers are prohibited from associating manuscripts with conflicts of interest caused by competitive, collaborative, or other relationships and connections with one of the authors, companies, or institutions related to the report manuscript.

6.

Source Acknowledgment:

Reviewers should identify published work that is relevant but has not been cited by the author. Statements that observations, derivations, or arguments have been previously reported must be accompanied by relevant citations. Reviewers should also raise editors' concerns regarding substantial similarities or overlaps between the manuscripts reviewed and any other published papers of which they are aware.