Enterprise Architecture Framework in Higher Education: Systematic Literature Review


  • Nur Shabrina Meutia Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya
  • Endang Sulistiyani Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya
  • Rizqi Putri Nourma Budiarti Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya
  • Rita Sari Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya




Enterprise Architecture, Higher Education, Enterprise Architecture Framework, University


The use of information and communication technology helps improve the quality of education and learning processes, research, libraries and information services, and university management. With the development of ICT, universities are one of the companies engaged in education, so that institutions and universities need an information system planning strategy. This study presents a detailed and extensive systematic literature review (SLR) to select studies that carry out the current application of Enterprise Architecture in higher education. The method used in this research is the incorporation of various systematic literature studies on previous studies related to research objectives. The results of this literature review reveal important aspects related to the use of enterprise architecture applications in higher education, such as the most popular frameworks used in higher education, examine the reasons and determine the criteria for using application-based frameworks, and why enterprise architecture frameworks are needed to implement in higher education.


Download data is not yet available.


Y. Utami, A. Nugroho, and A. F. Wijaya, “Perencanaan Strategis Sistem Informasi dan Teknologi Informasi pada Dinas Perindustrian dan Tenaga Kerja Kota Salatiga,” J. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 253–260, 2018.

M. Azmi, B. Soeddijono, and M. R. Arief, “Perencanaan Strategis Sistem Informasi dengan Metode Enterprise Architecture Planning (Studi Kasus: STMIK Syaikh Zainuddin NW Anjani-Lombok),” Respati, vol. 14, no. 2, 2019.

R. Winter and J. Schelp, “Enterprise architecture governance: the need for a business-to-IT approach,” in Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Applied computing, 2008, pp. 548–552.

J. C. Duarte and M. Lima-Marques, “Enterprise Architecture-State of the Art and Challenges.,” in ICEIS (3), 2010, pp. 101–112.

M. Lankhorst, “A Language for Enterprise Modelling,” in Enterprise Architecture at Work, Springer, 2013, pp. 75–114.

A. Lapkin et al., “Gartner clarifies the definition of the term enterprise architecture,” Gart. Res., 2008.

B. Kitchenham and S. Charters, “Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering,” 2007.

M. K. Anam, T. Nasution, S. Erlinda, L. Efrizoni, and S. Susanti, “The Analysis and Optimization of Business Processes for Students in Higher Education Based on Togaf 9.2,” Sci. J. Informatics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 230–243, 2021.

P. A. Ariawan, I. S. Putra, and I. M. Sudarma, “Analysis Analysis of Enterprise Architecture Design Using TOGAF Framework: A Case Study at Archival Unit of Faculty of Agricultural Technology of Udayana University,” Int. J. Eng. Emerg. Technol., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 52–57, 2018.

J. G. P. Negara and A. W. R. Emanuel, “Enterprise Architecture Design Strategies for UGK Using TOGAF ADM,” in 1st Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities, Economics and Social Sciences (BIS-HESS 2019), 2020, pp. 491–495.

S. Soares and D. B. Setyohady, “Enterprise architecture modeling for oriental university in Timor Leste to support the strategic plan of integrated information system,” in 2017 5th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), 2017, pp. 1–6.

A. Guntara, A. Saeppani, I. Fadil, and F. Supriadi, “Enterprise Information System Planning Using TOGAF Architecture Development Method on XYZ College,” in 2020 8th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), 2020, pp. 1–6.

A. Y. Eskaluspita and I. D. Sumitra, “The open group architecture framework for designing the enterprise architecture of ALIT,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, vol. 879, no. 1, p. 12083.


G. F. Nama, D. Kurniawan, and others, “An enterprise architecture planning for higher education using the open group architecture framework (togaf): Case study University of Lampung,” in 2017 Second International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC), 2017, pp. 1–6.

S. Alamri, M. Abdullah, and A. Albar, “Enterprise architecture adoption for higher education institutions,” Int. J. Simul. Syst. Sci. Technol., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 11–16, 2018.

M. Sidiq and I. D. Sumitra, “Strategic Information Systems Planning Using The Togaf Architecture Development Method,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, vol. 662, no. 2, p. 22057.

H. Supriyadi and E. Amalia, “Development of enterprise architecture in senior high school using TOGAF as framewrok,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 7, no. 4A, pp. 8–14, 2019.

U. Ulmi, A. P. G. Putra, Y. D. P. Ginting, I. L. Laily, F. Humani, and Y. Ruldeviyani, “Enterprise architecture planning for enterprise university information system using the TOGAF architecture development method,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, vol. 879, no. 1, p. 12073.

A. Ramadhan and A. A. Arman, “Enterprise Architecture in University analyzing of implementation using business process management,” in 2014 International Conference on ICT For Smart Society (ICISS), 2014, pp. 250–255.

K. Budiman, T. Prahasto, and A. Kusumawardhani, “Enterprise Architecture Planning in developing A planning Information System: a Case Study of Semarang State University,” in E3S Web of Conferences, 2018, vol. 31, p. 11002.

H. Supriadi, M. Kom, and E. Amalia, “University’s Enterprise Architecture Design Using Enterprise Architecture Planning (EAP) Based on the Zachman’s Framework Approach.,” Int. J. High. Educ., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 13–28, 2019.




How to Cite

Nur Shabrina Meutia, Sulistiyani, E., Budiarti, R. P. N., & Sari, R. (2022). Enterprise Architecture Framework in Higher Education: Systematic Literature Review. Applied Technology and Computing Science Journal, 5(2), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.33086/atcsj.v5i2.3751




Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>