DRIVING SUSTAINABLE PERFORMANCE AMONG MICRO-ENTREPRENEURS: THE INTERPLAY OF MENTAL MODEL DISRUPTION, ENTREPRENEURIAL KNOWLEDGE AND FRUGAL INNOVATION
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Prita Ayu Kusumawardhany
Imam Baihaqi
Putu Dana Karningsih
Abstract
This study investigates the factors driving frugal innovation and its impact on sustainable performance in fashion micro-entrepreneurs in Indonesia. It examines how mental model disruption and entrepreneurial knowledge drive frugal innovation, with the business ecosystem moderating the relationship. It also evaluates how frugal innovation directly affects sustainable performance. Data were collected from 340 micro-entrepreneurs through structured questionnaires and analyzed using SmartPLS. The findings reveal that mental model disruption significantly enhances frugal innovation, entrepreneurs who can challenge and transform existing mindsets are better equipped to develop cost-effective and resource-efficient innovations. Entrepreneurial knowledge also has a significant positive effect on frugal innovation, indicating that a deep understanding of market dynamics and resource utilization strengthens the capacity to develop innovative solutions that are both economical and effective. The study also confirms that the business ecosystem significantly moderates the relationship between mental model disruption and frugal innovation. Finally, frugal innovation has a significant positive impact on sustainable performance in achieving economic efficiency, social inclusivity, and environmental sustainability.
Keywords: sustainable performance, frugal innovation, mental model disruption, entrepreneurial knowledge, business ecosystem
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Copyright (c) 2026 Prita Ayu Kusumawardhany, Imam Baihaqi, Putu Dana Karningsih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Adner, R. 2006. Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 84(4), 98-107.
Afuah, A. 2014. Business Model Innovation: Concepts, Analysis, and Cases. Routledge.
Agarwal, N., Grottke, M., Mishra, S., & Brem, A. 2017. A systematic literature review of constraint-based innovations: State of the art and future perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 64(1), 3-15.
Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
Bhatti, Y. A., & Ventresca, M. 2013. How can 'frugal innovation' be conceptualized? Oxford Development Studies, 41(1), 45-62.
Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. 2014. A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42-56.
Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cronbach, L. J. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
Dabic, M. 2021. Frugal innovation and sustainable business models. International Journal of Innovation Management, 25(5), 215-236.
Dweck, C. S. 2006. Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
Elkington, J. 1997. Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Hossain, M. 2021. The role of mental model disruption in driving innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 168, 120-132.
Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. 2004. Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review, 82(3), 68-81.
Isenberg, D. J. 2010. How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 41-50.
Krueger, N. F., & Day, M. 2010. Looking forward, looking backward: From entrepreneurial cognition to neuroentrepreneurship. In Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 321-357). Springer, New York, NY.
Le, T., & Lei, H. 2020. Mental model disruption and innovation in organizations. Journal of Business Research, 118, 256-268.
Mezias, S. J., & Glynn, M. A. 1993. The three faces of corporate renewal: Institution, revolution, and evolution. Strategic Management Journal, 14(2), 77-101.
Moore, J. F. 1996. The death of competition: Leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. HarperBusiness.
Nambisan, S., & Sawhney, M. (2011). Orchestration processes in network-centric innovation: Evidence from the field. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(3), 40-57.
Nari Kahle, H., Dubiel, A., Ernst, H., & Prabhu, J. (2013). The democratizing effects of frugal innovation: Implications for inclusive growth and state-building. Journal of Indian Business Research, 5(4), 220-234.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Qin, X. (2024). Entrepreneurial knowledge and innovation performance: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. Journal of Business Venturing, 39(1), 117-131.
Radjou, N., & Prabhu, J. (2015). Frugal innovation: How to do more with less. The Economist.
Rao, B. C. (2013). How disruptive is frugal?. Technology in Society, 35(1), 65-73.
Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Broadway Business.
Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448-469.
Tiwari, R., & Herstatt, C. (2014). Aiming big with small cars: Emergence of a lead market in India. Springer.
Tsou, H. T. (2018). Sustainable performance through frugal innovation. Journal of Business Strategy, 39(4), 34-41.
Wagnild, G. M., & Young, H. M. (1993). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Resilience Scale. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 1(2), 165-178.
Zeschky, M., Winterhalter, S., & Gassmann, O. 2014. From cost to frugal and reverse innovation: Mapping the field and implications for global competitiveness. Research-Technology Management, 57(4),