ANALISIS WILLINGNESS TO PAY DAN PENGARUH VARIABEL PENDAPATAN, JUMLAH TANGGUNGAN RUMAH TANGGA, USIA, AKSES KE SEKOLAH TERHADAP PEMILIHAN SERTA PENGEMBANGAN STRATEGI PENGELOLAAN SEKOLAH
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to estimate and analyze the willingness to pay and fax tor the factors that affect the willingness to pay at High School in the of Semarang. The method used is Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) and multiple linear regression analysis. The number of samples in this study were 238 respondents, the sampling technique was done by snowball sampling. The results of this study indicate that the average willingness to pay (WTP) of households in High Schools in Semarang is Rp.559.034,00. Factors that have a significant influence on WTP values are income variables, number of household dependents, age and length of access. Whereas the factors that have no effect on willingness to pay (WTP) are parents' education variables. Based on the results of the study, the suggestions that can be put forward are the management or the government to improve the quality of the Vocational School as well as the development of a transparency policy on the collection and allocation of user fees and other resources.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Copyright (c) 2021 Christina Whidya Utami, Metta Padmalia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Anik Susanti & Dyah Maya Nihayah., (2019) Economics Development Analysis Journal 8 (2)
BPS. (2017). Central Java in Figures 2017. Semarang: BPS.
BPS. (2017). Semarang in Figures 2017. Semarang: BPS.
BPS. (2017). Indonesian Statistics 2017. Jakarta: BPS. Danim, S. (2003). Human Resource Economics.
Bandung: Loyal Library.Ekanem, EE, Okon, JE, & Ekpoh, UI (2012). Reforming Education through User Fees: Ability and Willingness to Pay For University Education in Calabar, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice , 3 (8).
Cahyaningrum, NI & Iasmaini, Z. (2012). Tobit Regression Approach to Factors Affecting Household Expenditures for Education in East Java. (http // www.digilib.its.ac.id). Downloaded on February 18, 2018.
Fauzi, A. (2004). Economy of Natural Resources and Environment. Jakarta: Main Gramedia Library.
Fildzah, S. (2016). Willingness to Pay (WTP) Facility of Health Social Security Organizing Agency in Banda Aceh . Essay. Banda Aceh: Syah Kuala University.
Gertler, P., & Glewwe, P. (1990). The Willingness to Pay for Education in Developing Countries Evidence from Rural Peru. Journal of Public Economics , 251-275.
Golbazi, Arel El Danaf, Can B. Aktas. (2020). Willingness to pay for green buildings: A survey on students’ perception in higher education. Energy and Building. Vol 216
Khasanah, N. (2012). Factors Affecting Parents in Decision Making Choosing Private Primary Schools (SD Virgo Maria 2 and SDIP. H. SoebandiBawenDistrict,SemarangRegency). Satya Widya , 28 (2), 137-146.
Li Jingru, Jian Zuo, Hong Guo, Gaihong He,Han Liu., 2018. Willingness to pay for higher construction waste landfill charge: A comparative study in Shenzhen and Qingdao, China. Waste Management 81. 226-233
Ngadi. (2014). Relevance of Vocational Education to the Labor Market in the . Indonesian Population Journal , 9 (1).
Nihayah, DM, & Kusumantoro. (2010). Determinants of Regional Wages: Skilled Labor and Uneducated Labor in Indonesia. JEJAK , 28- 39.
Nurtanto, M. (2015). Implementation of Problem- Based Learning Based Basic Compensation of Conventional Ignition Systems to Improve Cognitive, Psychomotor, and Affective Learning Outcomes of Ma'arif Salam Vocational School Students. In Thesis.
Prasetyo, PE (2012). Macroeconomic Fundamentals. Yoyakarta: Yogyakarta Beta Offset.
Rosyadi, MI, Sasongko, & Hoetoro, A. (2016). Willingness to Pay Households in Paying for Superior Middle Education Fees in Malang . Journal of Economics and Development Studies , 8 (2).
Sadikin, PN, Mulatsih, S., Pramudya, B., & Arifin, HS (2017). Willingness To Pay Analysis on Mount Rinjani National Park Ecotourism. Journal of Forestry Policy Analysis , 31-46.
Saptutyningsih, E. (2007). Influential Factors Against Willingness to Pay For Improvement of Code River Water Quality in Yogyakarta . Journal of Economics and Development Studies , VIII (2), 171-182.
Saqib, NU (2004). Willingness to Pay for Primary Education in Rural Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review , 43 (1), 77-51.
Sari, AK (2012). Analysis of the Effect of Education Levels, Economic Growth, and Wages on Educated Unemployment in West Sumatra. Journal of Development Economics .
Sari, HP, & Setiartiti, L. (2015). Willingness to Pay Improved Railway Service Quality. Journal of Economics and Development Studies , 16 (2), 200-209.
Sasmi, NA (2016). Factors Affecting Willingness to Pay Visitors to Goa Cemara Beach Tourism Object Using the Contingent Valuation Method (CVM). Essay. Yogyakarta: Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta.
Simanjuntak, GEM (2009). Willingness to Pay Society Analysis of Improvement of Service of Water Supply System with WSLC ( Water Study of Low Income Community ) (Case Study of Situdaun Village, Tenjolaya District, Bogor Regency). Thesis. Bogor Agricultural Institute.
Susiani, R. (2009). Study of the International Standard School (SBI) of SMU Negeri 2 Salatiga and Its Relationship in the Development of Surrounding Areas. In Thesis. Semarang: Diponegoro University.
Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta State University. Nurtanto, M., & Ramdani, SD (2016). Preparing Vocational Education Based on Local Wisdom.VOLT,1(1),59-66.Permata, MR (2012). Ability to Pay Analysis and Willingness to Pay for Soekarno Hatta- Manggarai Railway Service Users. Thesis. Depok: University of Indonesia.
Zuraidah, Y. (1999). Economic Crises Influence on Expenditures for Education and Family Health (Study of Civil Servants at the Bogor Agricultural Institute). Essay. Bogor: Bogor Agricultural Institute.
Walsh Sharon, John Cullinan, Darragh Flannery, 2018. Exploring Heterogenity in Willingness to Pay For The attributes of Higher Education Institutions. Oxford Economic Papers. 1-22 doi: 10.1093/oep/gpy030