Tinjauan Skala Ukuran Perusahaan terhadap Perilaku Entrepreneurial Marketing serta kaitanya dengan Dominasi Dimensi Opportunity dan Growth Orientation
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
This study aims to bridge the gap in the literature by examining the dimensions of Growth Orientation, Opportunity Orientation, Total customer focus dimensions, Value creation Networking, Informal Market Analysis, Closness to The Market on large and small company scale related to Entrepreneurial Marketing (EM) behavior. Thus the objectives to be developed in this study are: analyze how EM behavior in small companies compared to large companies? The dimensions of whether in entrepreneurial marketing are dominant in the context of small and large scale companies. The questionnaire was aimed at a national sample of 406 business owners in Indonesia, spread in 8 provinces. Small companies are defined as companies that employ at least 9 fewer full-time employees other than their owners, while large companies are companies that employ more than 9 full-time employees other than their owners. Snowball sampling is used to determine the selected respondent. The results showed that there are differences in entrepreneurial marketing behavior between large companies and small companies, where small scale companies have lower entrepreneurial marketing behavior compared to large scale companies. For small scale companies, it shows that opportunity orientation is the most dominant dimension, whereas in large scale companies it shows that growth orientation is the most dominant dimension.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Copyright (c) 2019 Christina Whidya Utami, Hendro Susanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Bonaccorsi, A. (1992), “On the relationship between firm size and export intensity”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 605-635.
Brush, C.G. and Chaganti, R. (1998), “Businesses without glamour? an Analysis of resources on performance by size and age in small service and retail firms”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 233-257.
Carson, D., Cromie, S., McGowan, P. and Hill, J. (1995), Marketing and Entrepreneurship in SMEs: An Innovative Approach, Prentice- Hall, London.
Carson, D. and Grant, K. (1998), “SME marketing competencies: a definition and some empirical evidence”, in Hills, G.E. and Miles, M. (Eds), Research at the Marketing/Entrepreneurship Interface, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, pp. 173-186.
Carson, D. and McCartan-Quinn, D. (1995), “Non-practice of theoretically based marketing in small business: issues arising and their implications”, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Vol. 3 No. 4, pp. 24-32.
Chen, M.J. and Hambrick, D.C. (1995), “Speed, stealth, and selective attack: how small firms differ from large firms in competitive behavior.” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 453-482.
Coviello, N., Brodie, R. and Munro, H. (2000), “An investigation of marketing practice by firm size”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 15 Nos 5/6, pp. 523-545.
Dean, T.J., Brown, R.L. and Bamford, C.E. (1998), “Differences in large and small firm responses to environmental context: strategic implications from a comparative analysis of business formations”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19 No. 8, pp. 709-728.
Hills, G. and Hultman, C. (1999), “Marketing behavior in growing firms: a challenge to traditional marketing knowledge”, in Hills, G.E., Siu, W. and Malewicki, D. (Eds), Research at the Marketing/Entrepreneurship Interface, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, pp. 14-29.
Hills, G. E., & Hultman, C. M. (2011). Academic Roots: The Past and Present of Entrepreneurial Marketing. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship ]
Hills G.E. & C. Hultman. (2013). Entrepreneurial Marketing: Conceptual and Emperical Research Opportunities. Entrepreneurship Research Journal Vol 3, Issue 4. Pg 437-448 ISSN (online) 2157-5665.
Hills, G. and Singh, R. (1998), “Opportunity recognition: a survey of high performing and representative entrepreneurs”, in Hills, G.E. and Miles, M. (Eds), Research at the Marketing/Entrepreneurship Interface, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, pp. 249-268.
Hisrich, R. (1992), “The need for marketing in entrepreneurship”, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 53-57.
Meziou, F. (1991), “Areas of strength and weakness in the adoption of the marketing concept by small manufacturing firms”, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 72-78.
Miles, M.P. and Darroch, J. (2006), “Large firms, entrepreneurial marketing processes, and the cycle of competitive advantage”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 40 Nos 5/6, pp. 485-501.
Morris, M., Schindehutte, M. and LaForge, R. (2002), “Entrepreneurial marketing: a construct for integrating emerging entrepreneurship and marketing perspectives”, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 1-19.
Runyan, R., Droge, C. and Swinney, J. (2008), “Entrepreneurial orientation versus small business orientation: what are their relationships to firm performance?”, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 46 No. 4, pp. 567-588.
Sriram, V. and Sapienza, H. (1991), “An empirical investigation of the role of marketing for small exporters”, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 33-43.
Stasch, S. (1999), “Guerilla marketing in new venture marketing strategies”, in Hills, G.E., Siu, W. and Malewicki, D. (Eds), Research at the Marketing/Entrepreneurship Interface, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, pp. 57-67.
Thomas, L.C., Painbéni, S. and Barton, H. (2013), “Entrepreneurial marketing within the French wine industry”, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 238-260.
Weinstein, A. (1994), “Market definition in technology-based industry: a comparative study of small versus non-small companies”, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 28-36.