##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

ID Ralaivao Hanginiaina Emynorane https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7843-7841
ID Hasniati https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0573-9280
ID Muhammad Akmal Ibrahim https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7825-3958
MG Veriza Roberto Francis https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1018-4582

Abstract

This study explores the roles of government, universities, and the private sector in the implementation of higher education reform in Madagascar, with particular attention to the nature of their collaboration and the challenges that shape it. Using a qualitative case-study approach, data were collected at the University of Toliara through in-depth interviews with 15 key informants consisting of government officials, university administrators and academic staff, and private-sector representatives, complemented by field observations. Thematic analysis was employed to identify patterns related to stakeholder roles, institutional responses, and collaborative practices. The findings reveal that higher education reform in Madagascar continues to be predominantly state-driven, with government institutions exercising substantial influence through regulatory frameworks and policy directives. Universities have sought to adapt to these reforms by revising curricula and strengthening internal coordination; however, persistent constraints related to funding, infrastructure, and research capacity have limited their ability to implement change effectively. Private-sector involvement has primarily focused on graduate employability through internships, recruitment activities, and occasional feedback on workforce needs, yet these relationships remain largely informal and insufficiently embedded within institutional structures. Fragmented communication, uneven institutional capacities, and the absence of formal coordination mechanisms further hinder collaborative reform efforts. This study contributes empirical evidence from Madagascar, a context that remains underrepresented in the literature on higher education reform and collaborative governance. The findings suggest that collaborative arrangements in resource-constrained environments are shaped by asymmetries in institutional capacity and influence, resulting in partnerships that differ from idealized models of stakeholder cooperation. Strengthening institutional support, establishing formal coordination platforms, and fostering sustained engagement among stakeholders are therefore essential to improving the effectiveness and sustainability of higher education reform in developing-country contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Emynorane, R. H., Hasniati, Ibrahim, M. A., & Francis, V. R. (2026). Government, University, and Private-Sector Collaboration in Madagascar’s Higher Education Reform: Case of University of Toliara. Education and Human Development Journal, 11(2), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.33086/ehdj.v11i2.8464
Section
Articles
Government, Private Sector, Higher Education, Reform, Madagascar

References

1. Marginson, S., & Rhoades, G. (2002). Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher education: A glonacal agency heuristic. *Higher Education, 43*, 281–309. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014699605875

2. Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., & Salerno, C. (2008). Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. *Higher Education, 56*, 303–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9128-2

3. Alshammari, A. A. (2025). The governance of higher education and its role in achieving sustainable development in the Arab World. *IntechOpen, 10*, 11105. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1011105

4. Worku, M. Y. (2025). Access-equity tensions in education: Examining Ethiopia’s educational reforms through a distributive social justice lens. *Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11*, 101443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101443

5. Geiger, R. L. (1988). Public and private sectors in higher education: A comparison of international patterns. *Higher Education, 17*(6), 699–711. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3447010

6. Sutin, S. (2016). Reforming higher education from within: Lessons learned from other mature sectors of the economy. *International Journal of Educational Development, 52*, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.11.003

7. Pilonato, S., & Monfardini, P. (2020). Performance measurement systems in higher education: How levers of control reveal the ambiguities of reforms. *The British Accounting Review, 52*, 100908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2020.100908

8. Kountouris, Y. (2020). Higher education and fertility: Evidence from reforms in Greece. *Economics of Education Review, 79*, 102059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2020.102059

9. Bolhaar, J., Kuijpers, S., Webbink, D., & Zumbuehl, M. (2024). Does replacing grants by income-contingent loans harm enrolment? New evidence from a reform in Dutch higher education. *Economics of Education Review, 101*, 102546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2024.102546

10. Irakli, L. (2021). Reforming the education system in Georgia: Challenges and perspectives. *Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30*, 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2021.05.007

11. Gachie, W. (2020). Higher education institutions, private sector and government collaboration for innovation within the framework of the Triple Helix Model. *African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 12*(2), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2019.1631120

12. Valakas, G., Borojević Šoštarić, S., & Adam, K. (2025). Project development management for innovation and research: A module approach for researchers in higher education institutions. *Procedia Computer Science, 253*, 815–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.01.143

13. Tomusk, V. (2001). Higher education reform in Estonia: A legal perspective. *Higher Education Policy, 14*, 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-8733(01)00014-9

14. Turri, M. (2014). The new Italian agency for the evaluation of the university system (ANVUR): A need for governance or legitimacy? *Quality in Higher Education, 20*(1), 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2014.889429

15. Francesconi, M., Slonimczyk, F., & Yurko, A. (2019). Democratizing access to higher education in Russia: The consequences of the unified state exam reform. *European Economic Review, 117*, 56–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.04.007

16. Boccanfuso, D., Larouche, A., & Trandafir, M. (2015). Quality of higher education and the labor market in developing countries: Evidence from an education reform in Senegal. *World Development, 74*, 412–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.007

17. Eric, R. R., Arrive, J. T., & Emynorane, R. H. (2025). Impact of the higher education training on the labor market demand: Evidence from African higher education. *International Journal of Educational Research, 2*(2), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijer.v2i2.303

18. Hassan, Z., Silong, A. D., Ismail, I. A., & Asmiran, S. (2011). Developing new generation of educational leaders for world class university. *Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15*, 812–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.190

19. Ortega, J. L., & Aguillo, I. F. (2009). Mapping world-class universities on the web. *Information Processing & Management, 45*(2), 272–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2008.10.001

20. Avenali, A., Daraio, C., Di Leo, S., & Wolszczak-Derlacz, J. (2024). Heterogeneity of national accounting systems, world-class universities and financial resources: What are the links? *Journal of Informetrics, 18*(2), 101502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2024.101502

21. Khoa, B. T., & Huynh, T. T. (2023). The effectiveness of knowledge management systems in motivation and satisfaction in higher education institutions: Data from Vietnam. *Data in Brief, 49*, 109454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.109454

22. Yeravdekar, V. R., & Tiwari, G. (2014). Global rankings of higher education institutions and India’s effective non-presence: Why have world-class universities eluded the Indian higher education system? *Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 157*, 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.010

23. Wedekind, V., & Mutereko, S. (2016). Higher education responsiveness through partnerships with industry: The case of a university of technology programme. *Development Southern Africa, 33*(3), 376–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2016.1156516

24. Cummins, P. W. (2016). Higher education reform and language for business and entrepreneurship. *Transnational Corporations Review, 8*(4), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/19186444.2016.1265769

25. Emynorane, R. H., & Arrive, J. T. (2024). Characteristics of African political leaders: Perspectives of African international students. *Journal of Governance and Public Administration (JoGaPA), 2*(1), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.70248/jogapa.v2i1.1647

26. Saruchera, S., & Gie, L. (2025). Impact of informal human resource practices on employee outcomes in private tertiary education institutions. *International Journal of African Higher Education, 11*(2), 84–119. https://doi.org/10.6017/ijahe.v11i2.17433

27. Vyas, P. (2024). Knowledge management and higher education institute: Review and topic analysis. *Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10*, 100349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100349

28. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1998). The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies. *Science and Public Policy, 25*(3), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/25.3.195

29. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. *Research Policy, 29*(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4

30. Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple Helix systems: An analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. *Industry and Higher Education, 27*(4), 237–262. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0165

31. Antal, C., & Easton, P. (2009). Indigenizing civic education in Africa: Experience in Madagascar and the Sahel. *International Journal of Educational Development, 29*(6), 599–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2008.10.004

32. Emynorane, R. H., Ibrahim, M. A., Hasniati, & Yunus, M. (2025). Challenges to the effectiveness of higher education in Madagascar: An analysis of key hindering factors. *KnE Social Sciences, 10*(18), 579–595. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i18.19486

33. Dunlop, E., & Bekkouche, Y. (2024). It’s our turn (not) to learn: The pitfalls of education reform during post-war institutional transformation in Burundi. *International Journal of Educational Development, 104*, 102966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102966

34. Da Costa Marques, M. D. C. (2025). The management of higher education institutions in Portugal from a sustainable perspective. *Procedia Computer Science, 256*, 706–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.02.170

35. Vauterin, J. J., Michelsen, K.-E., & Linnanen, L. (2013). Attracting and retaining student talent from around the world: The lived experience in university–industry collaboration. *Industry and Higher Education, 27*(3), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0155

36. Thune, T. (2011). Success factors in higher education–industry collaboration: A case study of collaboration in the engineering field. *Tertiary Education and Management, 17*(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2011.552627

37. Badiee, A., Moshtari, M., & Berenguer, G. (2024). A systematic review of operations research and management science modeling techniques in the study of higher education institutions. *Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 93*, 101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2024.101889

38. Yasin, N., Gilani, S. A. M., Nair, G., Abaido, G. M., & Askri, S. (2023). Establishing a nexus for effective university–industry collaborations in the MENA region: A multi-country comparative study. *Industry and Higher Education, 37*(6), 706–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222231175862

39. Marques, M. C. da C. (2025). The management of higher education institutions in Portugal from a sustainable perspective. *Procedia Computer Science, 256*, 706–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.02.170

40. De los Ríos-Carmenado, I., Sastre-Merino, S., Díaz Lantada, A., García-Martín, J., Nole, P., & Pérez-Martínez, J. E. (2021). Building world class universities through innovative teaching governance. *Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70*, 101031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101031

41. Ibidunni, A. S., Nwaodu, B. Y., & Mdaka, L. E. (2023). Bringing quality management to perspective in higher education institutions’ research output: A focus on selected private universities in Nigeria. *Heliyon, 9*, e15443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15443

42. Rahman, M. M., & Nasrin, S. (2024). Perceived service quality at higher education institutions: A study on the success factors of total quality management practices in Bangladesh. *Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10*, 100997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100997

43. Benneworth, P., & Jongbloed, B. W. (2010). Who matters to universities? A stakeholder perspective on humanities, arts and social sciences valorisation. *Higher Education, 59*, 567–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9265-2

Ralaivao Hanginiaina Emynorane, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Hasanuddin

Hasniati, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Hasanuddin

Muhammad Akmal Ibrahim, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Hasanuddin

Veriza Roberto Francis, Président de l’Université, Université de Toliara