##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Khafifa Fuji Lestari Kamariah

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the influence of learning facilities and teaching methods on students' motivation to learn English at MTsN 3 Sidenreng Rappang South Sulawesi. Motivation is considered one of the fundamental factors in language learning success. The participants in this study were 150 students at MTsN 3 Sidenreng Rappang South Sulawesi. This research includes a type of quantitative research analysis method using descriptive statistical analysis and data analysis to test validity and reliability tests. The results of the study indicate that an improvement in learning facilities has a positive impact on enhancing students' motivation to learn English. The selection of appropriate teaching methods can create a more conducive learning environment and facilitate better understanding by students. Furthermore, the availability of good learning facilities and the implementation of suitable teaching methods can influence and strengthen students' motivation to learn. The correlation coefficient between learning facilities, teaching methods, and students' motivation to learn was examined. These findings provide strong empirical evidence of the importance of adequate learning facilities and effective teaching methods in enhancing students' motivation to learn English.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Lestari, K. F., & Kamariah. (2023). The Motivation of Learning English: A Case Study of Junior High School Students. Education and Human Development Journal, 8(2), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.33086/ehdj.v8i2.4973
Section
Articles
learning facilities, teaching methods, learning motivation

References

Abdullahi, I., & Yusoff, W. Z. W. (2019). Influence of facilities performance on student’s satisfaction in Northern Nigerian universities. Facilities, 37(3/4), 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-08-2017-0088

Abrahams, I. (2007). An Unrealistic Image of Science. School Science Review, 88(324), 119–122. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-08-2017-0088 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/F-08-2017-0088

Adewunmi, T. B. (2000). The influence of physical resources on pupils academic performance in lagos state primary school [Unpublished M.Ed. Dissertation]. University of Benin.

Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevant is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and sup pressing teacher behaviors predicting students’ engagement in school work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 262–278. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-08-2017-0088 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/000709902158883

Briggs, D. C., Chattergoon, R., & Burkhardt, A. (2019). Examining the dual purpose use of student learning objectives for classroom assessment and teacher evaluation. Journal of Educational Measurement, 56 (4), 686–714. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12233 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12233

Brooks, E., & Weiler, S. C. (2018, Spring). The relationship between the condition of colorado elementary school facilities and student achievement. Journal of Education Finance, 43(4), 397–416. https://www. muse.jhu.edu/article/707921

Babić, I. Đ. (2017). Machine learning methods in predicting the student academic motivation. CORR: Croatian Operational Research Review, 8(2), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.17535/crorr.2017.0028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17535/crorr.2017.0028

Barnawi, A. M. (2012). The management of school facilities. AR-RUZZ MEDIA.

Boakye-Boaten, A. (2015). Changes in the Concept of Childhood: Implications on Children in Ghana. The Journal of International Social Research, 3(10), 104-115. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/42637307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.10.3.5890-5905

Cocca M, Cocca A. Affective variables and motivation as predictors of proficiency in English as a foreign language. J Effic Responsib Educ Sci. 2019;12(3):75–83. Doi:10.7160/eriesj.2019.120302 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2019.120302

Clark, K.R. (2015), The effects of the flipped model of instruction on student engagement and performance in the secondary mathematics classroom. Journal of Educators Online, 12(1), 91-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2015.1.5

DeMonbrun, M., Finelli, C. J., Prince, M., Borrego, M., Shekhar, P., Henderson, C., & Waters, C. (2017). Creating an instrument to measure student response to instructional practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(2), 273–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20162 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20162

Filges, T., Sonne-Schmidt, C. S., & Nielsen, B. C. V. (2018). Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 14(1), 1–107. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2018.10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2018.10

Fan, J. J. & Feng, H.Y., (2012). A Study on Students’ Learning Motivation of EFL in Taiwanese Vocational College. International Journal of Learning & Development, 2(3), 260-269. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijld.v2i3.1791 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ijld.v2i3.1791

González-Gomez, D., Jeong, J.S., Airado Rodríguez, D. and Cañada-Cañada, F. (2016), Performance and perception in the flipped learning model: an initial approach to evaluate the effectiveness of anew teaching methodology in a general science classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 450-459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9605-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9605-9

Hair, J.F., Sarstedt, M. and Ringle, C.M. (2019), Rethinking some of the rethinking of partial least squares. European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 53 No. 4, pp. 566-584. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-10-2018-0665 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-10-2018-0665

Hamidi, H., & Chavoshi, A. (2018). Analysis of the essential factors for the adoption of mobile learning in higher education: A case study of students of the University of Technology. Telematics and Informatics, 35(4), 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.09.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.09.016

Han, J., & Yin, H. (2016). Teacher motivation: definition, research development and implications for teachers. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1–18. Hopland, A. O., & Nyhus, O. H. (2016). Learning environment and student effort International. Journal of Educational Management, 30(2), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1217819 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1217819

Ho, F., & Siegel, L. S. (2014). A study of the relationships among chinese multicharacter words, subtypes of readers, and instructional methods. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414529334 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414529334

Lyioma, T., & Kipng’etich. (2017). Perception of teachers on availability of instructional materials and physical facilities in secondary schools of Arusha District, Tanzania. International Journal of Educational Policy Research and Review, 4(5), 103–112. 12. https://doi.org/10.15739/IJEPRR.17.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15739/IJEPRR.17.012

Mendoza NB, Yan Z, King RB. Domain-specific motivation and self-assessment practice as mechanisms linking perceived need-supportive teaching to student achievement. Eur J Psychol Educ. 2022;1–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-022-00620-1

Musthafa, B. (2010). English Teaching in Indonesia: Status, Issues and Challenges. In ESL Magazin, 5(1), 26-28. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273047933

Neolaka, F., Manggoa, M., & Nenotek, S. A. (2016, October). The implementation of curriculum 2013 at state junior high school 1 central Kupang Kupang regency academic year 2013/2014. Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development, 1(10), 2010–2015. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/article/view/7410

Putri, L. W., & Usman, O. (2019, July 5). Influence of learning strategy, learning style, practical facilities, and media learning on learning outcomes of SMK students. Learning Style, Practical Facilities, and Media Learning on Learning Outcomes of SMK Students. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3415475 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3415475

Pradono, S., Astriani, M. S., & Moniaga, J. (2013, October). A method for interactive learning. International Journal of Communication & Information Technology (Commit), 7(2), 46–48. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIT49014.2019.9144964 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21512/commit.v7i2.583

Rheinberg, F., & Engeser, S. (2018). Intrinsic motivation and flow. In Heckhausen J., Heckhausen H. (eds), Motivation and action (pp. 579–622). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65094-4_14

Sugiyono. (2014). Quantitative and qualitative research method and R&D. Publisher CV Alfabeta.

Tisch, M., & Metternich, J. (2017). Potentials and limits of learning factories in research, innovation transfer, education, and training. Procedia Manufacturing, 9, 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.027

Virvou, M., Katsionis, G., & Manos, K. (2005). Combining software games with education: Evaluation of its educational effectiveness. Educational Technology and Society, 8(2), 54–65. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/jeductechsoci.8.2.54

Yang, X., Zhao, X., Tian, X., & Xing, B. (2020). Effects of environment and posture on the concentration and achievement of students in mobile learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1707692 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1707692

Khafifa Fuji Lestari, National Dong Hwa University

Kamariah, Madrasah Tsanawiyah Negeri 3 Sidenreng Rappang, Indonesia