Implementation of English Language Teaching (ELT) Through Understanding Non-EFL Students’ Learning Styles
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
This research investigates the non-EFL students9 learning styles and describes how to teach
English with different learning styles. This research is descriptive qualitative research. The analysis
shows that are six types of students9 learning styles including VAK (Visual, Auditory, and Kinesthetic),
also the combinations of learning styles including visual-auditory, visual kinesthetic, and auditory
kinesthetic. This also shows that students can have more than one learning style such as visual-auditory,
visual-kinesthetic, and auditory-kinesthetic learning styles. Non-EFL students learning a language tend
to apply a visual learning style. Students with a visual learning style more easily absorb information
from the sense of sight, such as through pictures/images. While students with an auditory learning style
easily understand when processing information through the sense of hearing (listening). On the other
hand, students with a kinesthetic learning style need opportunities to be actively moving. Therefore, with
understanding and the teacher’s knowledge of learning styles each student in the teacher’s class can
implement interesting and meaningful English learning. Understanding the learning styles may be very
helpful for students to learn via activities in the manner in which they learn best. It will assist students to
comprehend the course material easily, so enhancing their motivation and language skills, enhancing
their enjoyment of the learning process, reducing their stress levels, and resulting in higher performance.
When the teacher understands students’ learning styles, teachers should provide interesting materials and
an appropriate learning environment
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Copyright (c) 2023 Tira Nur Fitria
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Ambrose, Valerie K., C. Amelia Davis, and Mary F. Ziegler. 2013. “A Framework of Contextualized Teaching and Learning: Assisting Developmental Education Instructors.” Pp. 1–7 in Conference Proceedings Adult Education Research Conference 2013. St. Louis, MO: New Prairie Press.
Aydin-Ceran, Sema. 2022. “Contextual Learning and Teaching Approach in 21st Century Science Education.” Pp. 160–73 in Current Studies in Social Sciences 2021, edited by Á. Csiszárik-Kocsir and P. Rosenberger. Konya, Turkiye: ISRES Publishing.
Baker, Elaine DeLott, Laura Hop, and Kelley Karandjeff. 2009. “Contextualized Teaching & Learning: A Promising Approach for Basic Skills Instruction.”
Baker, Elaine DeLott, Laura Hope, and Kelley Karandjeff. 2009. Contextualized Teaching & Learning: A Faculty Primer. California: the Chancellor’s Office of the California Community Colleges.
Berns, RobertG., and PatriciaM. Erickson. 2001. “Contextual Teaching and Learning: Preparing Students for the New Economy.”
Davtyan, Ruzanna. 2014. “Contextual Learning.” Pp. 1–4 in Proceedings of the SEE 2014 Zone I Conference. Vol. 1. Bridgpeort, CT, USA: University of Bridgeport.
Dewi, Putu Yulia Angga, and Kadek Hengki Primayana. 2019. “Effect of Learning Module with Setting Contextual Teaching and Learning to Increase the Understanding of Concepts.” International Journal of Education and Learning 1(1):19–26. doi: 10.31763/ijele.v1i1.26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v1i1.26
Elliott, John. 2001. Action Research for Educational Change. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Fauziah, A. M., and T. Nurita. 2019. “Activities of Students in Using Worksheet Based on Contextual Teaching and Learning.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1417(1):012088. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012088. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012088
Ginting, Masta. 2016. “Penerapan Pendekatan Contextual Teaching and Learning Dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Ipa Di Kelas Iv Sd Negeri 060948 Medan Labuhan.” School Education Journal Pgsd Fip Unimed 5(1):13–21. doi: 10.24114/sejpgsd.v5i1.4157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/sejpgsd.v5i1.4157
Glynn, Shawn M., and Linda K. Winter. 2004. “Contextual Teaching and Learning of Science in Elementary Schools.” Journal of Elementary Science Education 16(2):51–63. doi: 10.1007/BF03173645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173645
Kemendikbud. 2014. “Konsep Dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013.”
Lestari, Yunia, Sugeng Sutiarso, and Sugilar Sugilar. 2022. “Pengaruh Bahan Ajar E-Modul Berpendekatan Contextual Teaching Learning Terhadap Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Peserta Didik.” Jurnal Pendidikan 23(2):101–6. doi: 10.33830/jp.v23i2.3579.2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33830/jp.v23i2.3579.2022
Marta, Hilda, Yanti Fitria, Hadiyanto Hadiyanto, and Ahmad Zikri. 2020. “Penerapan Pendekatan Contextual Teaching and Learning Pada Pembelajaran Ipa Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Dan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar.” Jurnal Basicedu 4(1):149–57. doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v4i1.334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i1.334
Muthoharoh, Lutfi, Yayuk Mardiati, and Chumi Zahroul Fitriyah. 2020. “Penerapan Model Contextual Teaching and Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas V Tema Peristiwa Dalam Kehidupan Di SD Muhammadiyah 1 Jember.” Jurnal Edukasi 7(2):9. doi: 10.19184/jukasi.v7i2.22666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19184/jukasi.v7i2.22666
Nadhiroh, Siti, and Nur Efendi. 2023. “Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Approach to Science Learning Outcomes in Grade 4 Elementary Schools: Pendekatan Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA pada Kelas 4 Sekolah Dasar.” Indonesian Journal of Education Methods Development 21. doi: 10.21070/ijemd.v21i.723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/ijemd.v21i.723
Pahrudin, Agus dan Pratiwi, Dinda Dona. 2019. Pendekatan Saintifik Dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 & Dampaknya Terhadap Kualitas Proses Dan Hasil Pembelajaran. Vol. 1.
Rahmaniati, Syfa, and Asep Samsudin. 2023. “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching And Learning Untuk Mengetahui Gambaran Pemahaman Konsep Ipa Siswa Kelas 3 Sekolah Dasar.” Sebelas April Elementary Education 2(1):102–9.
Rivet, Ann E., and Joseph S. Krajcik. 2008. “Contextualizing Instruction: Leveraging Students’ Prior Knowledge and Experiences to Foster Understanding of Middle School Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45(1):79–100. doi: 10.1002/tea.20203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20203
Sulthon, Sulthon. 2017. “Pembelajaran IPA Yang Efektif Dan Menyenangkan Bagi Siswa MI.” ELEMENTARY: Islamic Teacher Journal 4(1). doi: 10.21043/elementary.v4i1.1969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21043/elementary.v4i1.1969
Surahman, Ritman Ishak Paudi dan Dewi Tureni. 2017. “Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran IPA Pokok Bahasann Makhluk Hidup Dan Proses Kehidupan Melalui Media Gambar Kontekstual Pada Siswa Kelas II SD ALkhairaat Towera.” Kreatif Tadulako 13(1):104–16.
Susilowati. 2014. “Pembelajaran IPA pada Kurikulum 2013.”