The Interactive Kahoot Game's Impact on Student Interest and Learning Independence in Mathematics Learning
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
This study aims to examine the impact of the interactive game-based platform Kahoot on student engagement and learning independence in mathematics instruction at Kebun 2 Elementary School. The study addresses two critical issues: low levels of student engagement and the limited development of independent learning strategies in mastering mathematical concepts, both of which necessitate the adoption of innovative pedagogical approaches to foster active participation. This research offers a novel contribution by exploring the application of Kahoot as an interactive instructional tool in elementary mathematics education within a local context, where such studies remain limited. A quasi-experimental design with a quantitative approach was employed, involving 50 fifth-grade students (classes V-A and V-B) selected through saturation sampling. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire measuring student engagement and learning independence. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Independent Samples t-test with IBM SPSS version 27. The findings reveal that the post-test results for both variables yielded a p-value of 0.000, which is below the established threshold of α = 0.05, indicating a statistically significant difference between the experimental and control groups. These results demonstrate that the integration of Kahoot significantly enhances student engagement and promotes greater learning independence in mathematics. In conclusion, this study underscores the pedagogical value of interactive digital platforms as effective alternative strategies for creating more engaging learning environments and fostering student autonomy in elementary mathematics education
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Copyright (c) 2026 Indah Kusuma Wardani, Sucipto, Nuril Huda, Sunardjo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
S. Masitoh and Fitriatul, “Google Classroom Application in Blended Learning: Indonesian EFL Learners’ Perception,” Education and Linguistics Knowledge Journal (Edulink), vol. 4, no. 1, p. 2022, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.32503/edulink.v4i1.2378.
I. Sarifah, N. Nurhasanah, U. Hasanah, A. Marini, and U. Muawanah, “How can educational policy support the application of the Rasch Model for character E-assessment in elementary schools during Indonesia’s new normal era?,” Social Sciences & Humanities Open, vol. 12, p. 101752, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.SSAHO.2025.101752.
N. Novianti, “Indonesian Folk Narratives: On the Interstices of National Identity, National Values, and Character Education,” Journal of Ethnology and Folkloristics, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 99–116, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.2478/jef-2022-0006.
N. Zakharova, S. Frumina, L. Lobuteva, and S. Alwaely, “The specifics of integrating distance learning technologies with traditional classroom instruction: How to design educational curricula in modern education?,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 20, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38740.
M. Alenezi, S. Wardat, and M. Akour, “The Need of Integrating Digital Education in Higher Education: Challenges and Opportunities,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 15, no. 6, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15064782.
L. K. Fryer, A. Shum, R. B. King, and P. Lau, “How does interest in a course interact with course learning?,” Learn. Instr., vol. 98, p. 102106, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.LEARNINSTRUC.2025.102106.
T. Y. Mou, “Science learning with designed animation: Investigation of primary school children’s attitudes toward science learning, animation integration, and understanding level,” International Journal of Educational Research Open, vol. 4, p. 100246, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.IJEDRO.2023.100246.
E. C. van Aswegen and D. Pendergast, “The impact of interest: an emergent model of interest development in the early years,” Early Child Dev. Care, vol. 193, no. 13–14, pp. 1335–1349, 2023, doi: 10.1080/03004430.2023.2245575.
Y. Irma Waty Simanjuntak and D. Purwaningsih, “STEM Integrated Problem Based Learning: The Implementation and Roles in Science Learning,” Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 686–700, 2024, doi: 10.23960/jpmipa/v25i2.pp686-700.
T. N. Sipayung, Imelda, T. Y. E. Siswono, and Masriyah, “An analysis of students learning independence in mathematics based on google classroom,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing Ltd, Jan. 2022. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2157/1/012037.
B. Xu, X. Ma, Y. Zhang, and X. Wu, “How does mathematical literacy affect creative thinking? Independent effects and differential impacts across proficiency groups,” Acta Psychol. (Amst)., vol. 260, p. 105509, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.ACTPSY.2025.105509.
M. Maisyaroh, J. Juharyanto, B. B. Wiyono, A. M. Nawi, M. A. Adha, and I. Lesmana, “Unveiling the nexus of leadership, culture, learning independence, passion trend-based learning, and teacher creativity in shaping digital student skills,” Social Sciences & Humanities Open, vol. 9, p. 100884, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.SSAHO.2024.100884.
K. M. Grasse, M. Kreminski, N. Wardrip-Fruin, M. Mateas, and E. F. Melcer, “Using Self-Determination Theory to Explore Enjoyment of Educational Interactive Narrative Games: A Case Study of Academical,” Front. Virtual Real., vol. 3, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.3389/frvir.2022.847120.
S. Zahrotun Nisa, S. Nurhasanah Sabila, W. Puspita Ananda Ayu, and Z. Maesyaroh, “Aplikasi Kahoot Untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar,” JMI : Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu, vol. 1, no. 1, 2022.
A. Putra and K. Afrilia, “Systematic Literature Review : Penggunaan Kahoot Pada Pembelajaran Matematika,” Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika AL-QALASADI, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 110–122, 2020.
L. Henschel, D. Kügler, and M. Reuter, “FastSurferVINN: Building resolution-independence into deep learning segmentation methods—A solution for HighRes brain MRI,” Neuroimage, vol. 251, p. 118933, May 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2022.118933.
M. Mulyadi and Abd. Syahid, “Faktor Pembentuk dari Kemandirian Belajar Siswa,” Al-Liqo: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, vol. 5, no. 02, pp. 197–214, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.46963/alliqo.v5i02.246.
Masrah, “Pengaruh Minat Belajar Dan Kemandirian Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Di SMKN 3 Kota Banjarbaru Dimoderasi Oleh Motivasi Belajar,” KINDAI, vol. 19, no. 3, 2023.
A. M. Jarrah, Y. Wardat, P. Fidalgo, and N. Ali, “Gamifying mathematics education through Kahoot: Fostering motivation and achievement in the classroom,” 2025.
I. S. Lubis and S. Ulfah, “The implementation of Kahoot! based assessment and its impact on students’ motivation in learning mathematics,” Jurnal Inovasi dan Teknologi Pembelajaran, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 106–115, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.17977/um031v11i22024p106.
N. Pellas, “Effects of Kahoot! on K-12 Students’ Mathematics Achievement and Multi-Screen Addiction,” Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, vol. 8, no. 9, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.3390/mti8090081.
A. I. Wang and R. Tahir, “The effect of using Kahoot! for learning – A literature review,” Comput. Educ., vol. 149, p. 103818, May 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2020.103818.
K. Schultz et al., “The Impact of a Gamified Curriculum Using Kahoot! on Musculoskeletal Knowledge and Skill Acquisition Among Pediatric Residents,” Acad. Pediatr., vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1265–1270, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.ACAP.2022.02.003.
Amruddin, Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Sukoharjo: Pradina Pustaka, 2022.
Y.-C. Huang, “Comparison and Contrast of Piaget and Vygotsky’s Theories,” Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR 2021), vol. 554, no. 1, 2021.
A. Kauppinen and A. Iftikhar Choudhary, “Gamification in entrepreneurship education: A concrete application of Kahoot!,” The International Journal of Management Education, vol. 19, no. 3, p. 100563, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.IJME.2021.100563.
A. Faza and I. A. Lestari, “Self-Regulated Learning in the Digital Age: A Systematic Review of Strategies, Technologies, Benefits, and Challenges,” International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, vol. 26, 2025.
T. J. O. Eythan and L. T. Tin, “Self-directed learning through gamification of mathematics lessons: Literature review and a framework for enactment,” JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), Oct. 2024, doi: 10.23917/jramathedu.v9i4.4729.
M. Febriani Chandra, N. Yuhelman, and P. SISWA Maya Febriani Chandra, “Literatur Review : Pengembangan Media Kahoot Sebagai Media,” JIPMuktj:Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Muhammadiyah Kramat Jati, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 2023, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.pcmkramatjati.or.id/index.php/JIPMUKJT/index
A. R. Rojabi et al., “Kahoot, is it fun or unfun? Gamifying vocabulary learning to boost exam scores, engagement, and motivation,” Front. Educ. (Lausanne)., vol. 7, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.939884.
A. Aibar-Almazán, Y. Castellote-Caballero, M. del C. Carcelén-Fraile, Y. Rivas-Campo, and A. M. González-Martín, “Gamification in the classroom: Kahoot! As a tool for university teaching innovation,” Front. Psychol., vol. 15, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1370084.
Y. Yang, J. Chen, and X. Zhuang, “Self-determination theory and the influence of social support, self-regulated learning, and flow experience on student learning engagement in self-directed e-learning,” Front. Psychol., vol. 16, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1545980.
A. T. Pham, C. T. H. Thai, and T. Van Nguyen, “Gamified learning in grammar lessons: EFL students’ perceptions of Kahoot! and Quizizz,” Acta Psychol. (Amst)., vol. 259, p. 105436, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.ACTPSY.2025.105436.
Y. Navarro-Castillo, I. Pablo-Lerchundi, and G. Morales-Alonso, “Kahoot! as a tool to enhance learning for engineering students in economics & management courses,” The International Journal of Management Education, vol. 23, no. 2, p. 101173, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.IJME.2025.101173.
Y. Wirani, T. Nabarian, and M. S. Romadhon, “Evaluation of continued use on Kahoot! as a gamification-based learning platform from the perspective of Indonesia students,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 197, pp. 545–556, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.PROCS.2021.12.172.
D. H. Iwamoto, J. Hargis, E. J. Taitano, and K. Vuong, “Analyzing The Efficacy Of The Testing Effect Using Kahoot Tm On Student Performance,” Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 2017.
D. Orhan Göksün and G. Gürsoy, “Comparing success and engagement in gamified learning experiences via Kahoot and Quizizz,” Comput. Educ., vol. 135, pp. 15–29, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2019.02.015.
A. alsswey and M. Z. Malak, “Effect of using gamification of ‘Kahoot!’ as a learning method on stress symptoms, anxiety symptoms, self-efficacy, and academic achievement among university students,” Learn. Motiv., vol. 87, p. 101993, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.LMOT.2024.101993.
E. A. Al Ghawail and S. Ben Yahia, “Using the E-Learning Gamification Tool Kahoot! to Learn Chemistry Principles in the Classroom,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 207, pp. 2667–2676, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.PROCS.2022.09.325.
M. Martín-Sómer, J. Moreira, and C. Casado, “Use of Kahoot! to keep students’ motivation during online classes in the lockdown period caused by Covid 19,” Education for Chemical Engineers, vol. 36, pp. 154–159, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.ECE.2021.05.005.
Indah Kusuma Wardani