Charismatic Leadership, Joyful Learning, and Student Engagement in Maritime Vocational Education: The Moderating Role of Gender-Based Experiences
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Nazarwin Nazarwin
Yunia Wardi
Rino Rino
Abror Abror
Syafni Yelvi Siska
Abstract
This study investigates the effects of charismatic leadership and a joyful-learning approach on student engagement in a vocational maritime context at Politeknik Pelayaran Sumatera Barat. A census sampling strategy was employed (N = 368; 305 male, 63 female). Data were collected using a 20-item Likert-scale instrument (pilot-tested with n = 60) and analyzed via partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). The structural model explained a substantial proportion of variance in student engagement (R² = 0.908). Joyful learning demonstrated a large, positive, and statistically significant effect on engagement (p < 0.001). In contrast, charismatic leadership exhibited a small and non-significant effect (p = 0.127). Gender-based experiences showed a small but statistically significant direct effect on engagement (p < 0.001), yet did not significantly moderate the relationships between the predictors and engagement. These findings underscore the primacy of pedagogical design over instructor leadership style in fostering student engagement in vocational education. Specifically, practice-oriented and affectively engaging instructional strategies appear more influential than charismatic leadership behaviors. Practically, educators should prioritize the integration of joyful, experiential learning approaches. Future research should adopt more balanced samples, employ multi-group or experimental designs, and utilize more granular measures of gender-based experience to better elucidate subgroup differences and underlying causal mechanisms.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Copyright (c) 2026 Nazarwin Nazarwin, Yunia Wardi, Rino Rino, Abror Abror, Syafni Yelvi Siska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
[1] U. E. T. Castro. “Toward a unified framework: the intellectual lineage of student engagement in higher education (1999–2024)”. Cogent Education 11.1 (2024). doi:10.1080/2331186X.2024.2369002.
[2] N. Rehman, X. Huang, A. Mahmood, M. A. M. Algerafi, and S. Javed. “Project-based learning as a catalyst for 21st-Century skills and student engagement in the math classroom”. Heliyon 10.23 (2024), e39988. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39988.
[3] M. De Bruijn-Smolders and F. R. Prinsen. “Effective student engagement with blended learning: A systematic review”. Heliyon 10.23 (2024), e39439. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39439.
[4] W. James, G. Oates, and N. Schonfeldt. “Improving retention while enhancing student engagement and learning outcomes using gamified mobile technology”. Accounting Education 34.3 (2025), pp. 366–386. doi:10.1080/09639284.2024.2326009.
[5] J. Fleckenstein, T. Jansen, J. Meyer, R. Trüb, E. E. Raubach, and S. D. Keller. “How am I going? Behavioral engagement mediates the effect of individual feedback on writing performance”. Learning and Instruction 93.July (2024), p. 101977. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101977.
[6] O. Thiel and S. M. Hanssen. “Engagement, study habits, and students’ perceived competence in student-active early childhood teacher education”. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 3831 (2025), pp. 1–19. doi:10.1080/00313831.2025.2554729.
[7] K. Gravett and S. Lygo-Baker. “Affective encounters in higher education”. Studies in Higher Education 50.2 (2025), pp. 228–238. doi:10.1080/03075079.2024.2332427.
[8] L. Anthonysamy, T. E. Wut, and O. Wei. “Metacognitive strategy interventions to improve analytical thinking skills: A quasi-experimental study”. Social Sciences & Humanities Open 12.October (2025), p. 102021. doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102021.
[9] N. Fish, S. Bertone, and B. Van Gramberg. “Improving student engagement in employability development: recognising and reducing affective and behavioural barriers”. Studies in Higher Education 51.1 (2026), pp. 181–196. doi:10.1080/03075079.2025.2461271.
[10] A. Konstantinidis. “An integrative review of the literature on factors influencing student well-being in the learning environment”. International Journal of Educational Research Open 7.August (2024), p. 100384. doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100384.
[11] H. Balalle. “Exploring student engagement in technology-based education in relation to gamification, online/distance learning, and other factors: A systematic literature review”. Social Sciences & Humanities Open 9.October 2023 (2024), p. 100870. doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100870.
[12] X. Li and M. Kangas. “A systematic literature review of playful learning in primary education: teachers’ pedagogical activities”. Education 3–13 4279 (2024), pp. 1–16. doi:10.1080/03004279.2024.2416954.
[13] D. Jackson and M. D. O’Connor. “Curriculum approaches to strengthening student employability and improving graduate outcomes in the STM disciplines”. International Journal of Science Education 0693 (2024), pp. 1–24. doi:10.1080/09500693.2024.2419393.
[14] J. Rajeh, F. Bassam, and M. In. “Impact of classroom environment, teacher competency, information and communication technology resources, and university facilities on student engagement and academic performance”. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights 3.2 (2023), p. 100188. doi:10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.100188.
[15] L. H. Engelbert, M. Van Elk, M. Kandrik, J. Theeuwes, and M. Van Vugt. “The effect of charismatic leaders on followers’ memory, error detection, persuasion and prosocial behavior: A cognitive science approach”. The Leadership Quarterly 34.3 (2023), p. 101656. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2022.101656.
[16] A. B. Bakker, J. Hetland, O. K. Olsen, and R. Espevik. “Daily transformational leadership: A source of inspiration for follower performance?” European Management Journal 41 (2023), pp. 700–708. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2022.04.004.
[17] V. F. Espinosa and J. L. González. “The effect of teacher leadership on students’ purposeful learning”. Cogent Social Sciences 9.1 (2023). doi:10.1080/23311886.2023.2197282.
[18] N. Saif, Amelia, G. G. G. Goh, A. Rubin, I. Shaheen, and M. Murtaza. “Influence of transformational leadership on innovative work behavior and task performance of individuals: The mediating role of knowledge sharing”. Heliyon 10.11 (2024), e32280. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32280.
[19] M. S. W. Boysen, M. C. Sørensen, H. Jensen, J. Von Seelen, and H.-M. Skovbjerg. “Playful learning designs in teacher education and early childhood teacher education: A scoping review”. Teaching and Teacher Education 120 (2022). doi:10.1016/j.tate.2022.103884.
[20] V. D. Handel, V. Schrøder, K. Birkefoss, and M. N. Handel. “Interplay between playful learning, digital materials and physical activity in higher education: A systematic review of qualitative studies using meta-aggregation and GRADE-CERQual”. International Journal of Educational Research Open 5.April (2023). doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100284.
[21] H. Jensen and L. Lykke. “Smoothing the path to practice: Playful learning raises study happiness and confidence in future roles among student teachers and student ECE teachers”. Studies in Educational Evaluation 74.April (2022). doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101156.
[22] E. Blinkoff, K. T. Nesbitt, R. M. Golinkoff, and K. Hirsh-Pasek. “Investigating the contributions of active, playful learning to student interest and educational outcomes”. Acta Psychologica 238.June (2023), p. 103983. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103983.
[23] M. Abduh, J. Hasnur, and S. Y. Siska. “The effect of maritime English vocabulary for beginners module on the vocabulary learning outcomes”. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi 12.2 (2022), pp. 117–129. doi:10.21831/jpv.v12i2.49033.
[24] Nazarwin, Y. Wardi, and Rino. “HRM in VHE: Leadership, Employee Engagement and Work Environment”. Journal of Management and Business 7.2 (2024), pp. 108–138.
[25] J. Hasnur and L. D. Yatno. “Strengthening Future Maritime Transportation Management Through Cognitive Flexibility and Enterpreneurial Mindset Among Generation Z Maritime Students”. Jurnal Kebijakan Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan 15.2 (2025), pp. 123–135.
[26] A. Morariu, A. Tsvetkova, M. Hellström, V. Bolbot, and S. Virtanen. “Investigating educational solutions in the field of autonomous shipping at Finnish Universities”. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 31.April (2025), p. 101402. doi:10.1016/j.trip.2025.101402.
[27] D. N. Dehanas. “The spirit of populism: sacred, charismatic, redemptive, and apocalyptic dimensions”. Democratization 31.4 (2024), pp. 831–851. doi:10.1080/13510347.2023.2284277.
[28] N. S. Greimel, D. K. Kanbach, and M. Chelaru. “Virtual teams and transformational leadership: An integrative literature review and avenues for further research”. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge 8.2 (2023), p. 100351. doi:10.1016/j.jik.2023.100351.
[29] A. Uzorka and K. Kalabuki. “Educational leadership in the digital Age: An exploration of Technology’s impact on leadership practices”. Social Sciences & Humanities Open 11.February 2024 (2025), p. 101581. doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101581.
[30] S. Suyatmo, H. Prayitno, W. A. Wirawan, D. I. Pratiwi, and B. Waluyo. “Preparing industry-ready graduate: Interplay of lecturer behavior, self-motivation, and soft skill development in vocational education”. Acta Psychologica 261.October (2025), p. 105892. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105892.
[31] G. Eman, A. Hernandez, and V. Gonzalez-Roma. “Charismatic leadership, intra-team communication quality, and team performance: The role of average leadership perceptions and their homogeneity”. European Management Journal 42 (2024), pp. 735–744. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2023.04.011.
[32] L. Hui, S. F. E. Rovers, J. J. G. van Merrienboer, J. Donkers, and A. B. H. De Bruin. “Self-regulation of Flow: Creating ‘Seemingly Effortless’ Learning Among Higher Education Students”. International Journal of Educational Research 131.March (2025). doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102573.
[33] H. Thomann, J. Zimmermann, and V. Deutscher. “How effective is immersive VR for vocational education? Analyzing knowledge gains and motivational effects”. Computers & Education 220.July (2024), p. 105127. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105127.
[34] J. Pruyn. “The use of digital games in academic maritime education: a theoretical framework and practical applications”. Maritime Policy & Management 51.4 (2024), pp. 558–571. doi:10.1080/03088839.2023.2174608.
[35] H. Xue, Ø. Haugseggen, J. Røds, B. Batalden, and D. K. Prasad. “Assessment of stress levels based on biosignal during the simulator-based maritime navigation training and its impact on sailing route reliability”. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 24.February (2024), p. 101047. doi:10.1016/j.trip.2024.101047.
[36] G. Heilporn, A. Raynault, and E. Frenette. “Student engagement in a higher education course: A multidimensional scale for different course modalities”. Social Sciences & Humanities Open 9.October 2023 (2024). doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100794.
[37] T. K. F. Chiu. “Digital support for student engagement in blended learning based on self-determination theory”. Computers in Human Behavior 124.March (2021), p. 106909. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106909.
[38] M. Zoubir, M. Gruner, J. Heidinger, B. Schwarz, H. Jetter, and T. Franke. “Autonomy aweigh: Evaluation metrics and supporting seafarers’ basic psychological needs in energy-efficient route planning DSS”. Applied Ergonomics 128.March (2025), p. 104518. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104518.
[39] M. Laranjeira and M. O. Teixeira. “Relationships between engagement, achievement and well-being: validation of the engagement in higher education scale”. Studies in Higher Education 5079 (2025), pp. 756–770. doi:10.1080/03075079.2024.2354903.
[40] D. L. Roorda and S. Jak. “Gender match in secondary education: The role of student gender and teacher gender in student-teacher relationships”. Journal of School Psychology 107.August (2024), p. 101363. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101363.
[41] A. et al. Habibi. “Validating the determinants of teachers’ performance in vocational education: Indonesian perspectives”. Acta Psychologica 259.June (2025), p. 105332. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105332.
[42] W. et al. Farrell. “Perceptions of leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams: Gender, personality, and self- versus peer evaluations”. The Leadership Quarterly 36.3 (2025), p. 101859. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2024.101859.
[43] L. J. Kray, S. Mishra, C. H. Townsend, and J. A. Kennedy. “Psychological drivers of gender disparities in leadership paths”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences xx.xx (2025), pp. 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2025.10.008.
[44] J. Hair and A. Alamer. “Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example”. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 1.3 (2022), p. 100027. doi:10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027.
[45] S. Marar, M. A. Hamza, M. Ayyash, and A. A.-Shaheen. “Development and validation of an instrument to assess the knowledge and perceptions of predatory journals”. Heliyon 9.11 (2023), e22270. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22270.
[46] Y. Assefa, S. Ahmad, B. Tadesse, and H. Majeed. “Unpacking student engagement and its mediating role in predicting the relationship between self-determination and academic satisfaction among undergraduate students in higher education”. Social Sciences & Humanities Open 12.November 2024 (2025), p. 101797. doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101797.
[47] P. Cash, O. Isaksson, A. Maier, and J. Summers. “Sampling in design research: Eight key considerations”. Design Studies 78 (2022), p. 101077. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2021.101077.
[48] A. R. Kunselman. “A brief overview of pilot studies and their sample size justification”. Fertility and Sterility 121.6 (2024), pp. 899–901. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.040.
[49] S. Singh and R. Sagar. “A critical look at online survey or questionnaire-based research studies during COVID-19”. Asian Journal of Psychiatry 65.August (2021), p. 102850. doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102850.
[50] M. N. Islam. “Factors affecting adoption of self-service E-ticketing technology: A study on heritage sites in Bangladesh”. Heliyon 9.3 (2023), e14691. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14691.
[51] R. C. Liden, X. Wang, and Y. Wang. “The evolution of leadership: Past insights, present trends, and future directions”. Journal of Business Research 186.October 2024 (2025).
[52] N. Eryilmaz and R. Strietholt. “School leadership matters: Evidence from TIMSS on teacher job satisfaction and students’ academic outcomes”. International Journal of Educational Research Open 9.August (2025), p. 100520. doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2025.100520.
[53] A. A. M. M. A. El Deen, H. H. Albasis, and A. M. Mohamed. “Teacher charisma and AI-mediated education: Effects on EFL learners’ attitudes and self-efficacy”. Acta Psychologica 263.October 2025 (2026), p. 106244. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106244.
[54] S. Roseler, G. Hertel, and M. T. Thielsch. “What about the ‘soft factors’? Longitudinal effects of leadership behaviors on psychological resources of firefighters”. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 111.May (2024), pp. 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104720.
[55] J.-H. Cheah, S. Amaro, and J. L. Roldan. “Multigroup analysis of more than two groups in PLS-SEM: A review, illustration, and recommendations”. Journal of Business Research 156.December 2022 (2023). doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113539.
[56] K. T. Nesbitt, E. Blinkoff, A. B. Gunersel, and K. H. Pasek. “Feasibility and Acceptability of an Active Playful Learning Intervention for Kindergarten Teachers Using Instructional Coaching”. Early Education and Development 36.4 (2025), pp. 818–838. doi:10.1080/10409289.2025.2449688.
[57] X. Xu, Z. Shi, N. A. Bos, and H. Wu. “Student engagement and learning outcomes: an empirical study applying a four-dimensional framework”. Medical Education Online 28.1 (2023). doi:10.1080/10872981.2023.2268347.
[58] L. et al. Sibley. “Adaptive teaching with technology enhances lasting learning”. Learning and Instruction 99.April (2025), p. 102141. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102141.
[59] T. Sinha. “Making failure desired during learning – A quasi-experimental study”. Thinking Skills and Creativity 60.December 2025 (2026), p. 102094. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102094.
[60] A. A. Ogunyemi, J. S. Quaicoe, and M. Bauters. “Indicators for enhancing learners’ engagement in massive open online courses: A systematic review”. Computers and Education Open 3 (2022), p. 100088. doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100088.
[61] L. Mundelsee and K. Reschke. “Classroom interactions: The role of students’ gender, classroom subject, and social relations for student hand raising, teacher calls, and student talk time”. International Journal of Educational Research 133.June (2025), p. 102711. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102711.
[62] O. K. T. Yau, A. J. Martin, P. Ginns, and R. J. Collie. “Gender differences in academic buoyancy: A meta-analysis”. Learning and Individual Differences 121.February (2025), p. 102700. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102700.
[63] N. Almusharraf, M. Aljasser, H. Dalbani, and D. Alsheikh. “Gender differences in utilizing a game-based approach within the EFL online classrooms”. Heliyon 9.2 (2023), e13136. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13136.
[64] V. Korhonen, E. Ketonen, and A. Toom. “Student engagement and its development in university education: A three-year follow-up study”. Learning and Individual Differences 113.March (2024), p. 102465. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102465.
[65] R. Kaedabi-Donkor, M. O. Amponsah, B. Y. Dramanu, and F. Britwum. “Gender and age variations in academic self-concept and academic achievement of distance learners at the college of distance education: A quantitative cross-sectional study”. Cogent Education 12.1 (2025). doi:10.1080/2331186X.2025.2493013.
[66] D. Owusu and F. Arthur. “Modelling the nexus between mathematics teachers’ emotional intelligence and instructional effectiveness: A mediation moderation model using PLS-SEM approach”. Acta Psychologica 257.May (2025).
[67] J. Crawford, G. Lewis, and J. Kelder. “Authentic student leadership development: Structural equation model testing differences among student leader populations”. Educational and Developmental Psychologist 41.2 (2024), pp. 191–201. doi:10.1080/20590776.2024.2365846.
[68] X. Tian and Y. Zhang. “The mediating role of intrinsic motivation in the relationship between external support and performance goals among Chinese high school students: The moderating effect of gender”. Acta Psychologica 259.15 (2025), p. 105375. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105375.
[69] C. K. J. Ng, L. Y. J. Kwan, and W. Chan. “A Note on Evaluating the Moderated Mediation Effect”. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 31.2 (2024), pp. 340–356. doi:10.1080/10705511.2023.2201396.
[70] A. Islam, M. Anwar, M. Haque, and M. Salim. “Development of a multidomain gender norm attitude scale for youth in Bangladesh”. Preventive Medicine Reports 45.July (2024), p. 102848. doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102848.
[71] N. et al. Dong. “A Practical Guide to Power Analyses of Moderation Effects in Multisite Individual and Cluster Randomized Trials”. The Journal of Experimental Education 0.0 (2024), pp. 1–20. doi:10.1080/00220973.2024.2338521.
[72] I. Størksen, M. Rege, I. Foldøy, D. ten Braak, R. Lenes, and G. J. Geldhof. “The playful learning curriculum: A randomized controlled trial”. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 64.February (2023), pp. 36–46. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2023.01.015.
[73] F. Almasri, G. I. Hewapathirana, F. Alhashem, C. E. Daniel, and N. Lee. “The effect of gender composition and pedagogical approach on major and non-major undergraduates biology students’ achievement”. Interactive Learning Environments 31.10 (2023), pp. 7287–7319. doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2066138.
[74] P. A. Edelsbrunner and C. M. Thurn. “Improving the utility of non-significant results for educational research: A review and recommendations”. Educational Research Review 42.October 2023 (2024), p. 100590. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100590.
[75] B. D. Liengaard. “Measurement invariance testing in partial least squares structural equation modeling”. Journal of Business Research 177.February 2023 (2024), p. 114581. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114581.