The Effect of Smartboard-Based Interactive Media on Learning Interest and Mathematics Achievement of Elementary School Students
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Lilik Muji Hastutik
Muhajir
Nuril Huda
Sri Yuni Hanifah
Abstract
Integrating digital learning media in primary education has become increasingly important to enhance student engagement and academic achievement, particularly in subjects that students often perceive as difficult, such as mathematics. Interactive technologies such as Smartboards provide dynamic visual and interactive learning environments that can potentially improve students’ interest and learning outcomes. This study aims to examine the effect of interactive Smartboard media on students’ learning interest and mathematics achievement among fourth-grade students at SDN Kebun 2 Kamal. The research employed a quasi-experimental design with a quantitative approach. The sampling technique used was saturation sampling, involving the entire population of 50 students from classes IV-A and IV-B. The research instruments consisted of a mathematics learning achievement test and a questionnaire measuring students’ learning interest. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 21, including tests of validity, homogeneity, normality, and an independent samples t-test. The findings reveal a statistically significant improvement in both students’ interest and learning outcomes after the implementation of Smartboard-based instruction, with a significance value of 0.000 (p < 0.05). The results indicate that the use of Smartboard media effectively enhances students’ engagement and academic performance in mathematics. Therefore, Smartboard technology can be recommended as an alternative instructional medium to support the achievement of learning competencies in elementary mathematics education
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Copyright (c) 2026 Lilik Muji Hastutik, Muhajir, Nuril Huda, Sri Yuni Hanifah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
A. Mukminin, A. Habibi, L. D. Prasojo, A. Idi, and A. Hamidah, “Curriculum reform in indonesia: Moving from an exclusive to inclusive curriculum,” Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 53–72, 2019, doi: 10.26529/CEPSJ.543.
M. P. Osiesi and S. Blignaut, “Impact of the teacher education curriculum on the development of 21st-Century skills: Pre-service teachers’ perceptions,” Social Sciences & Humanities Open, vol. 11, p. 101317, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.SSAHO.2025.101317.
V. C. Blândul, “Inovation in Education – Fundamental Request of Knowledge Society,” Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 180, pp. 484–488, May 2015, doi: 10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2015.02.148.
J. M. Voogt and N. N. Pareja Roblin, “Curriculum and 21st century skills,” International Encyclopedia of Education: Fourth Edition, pp. 49–55, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.03007-4.
B. Xu, X. Ma, Y. Zhang, and X. Wu, “How does mathematical literacy affect creative thinking? Independent effects and differential impacts across proficiency groups,” Acta Psychol. (Amst)., vol. 260, p. 105509, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.ACTPSY.2025.105509.
W. Hidayat and U. Aripin, “The improvement of students’ mathematical understanding ability influenced from argument-driven inquiry learning,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1157, no. 3, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032085.
O. Fitzmaurice, N. O’meara, and P. Johnson, “Highlighting the Relevance of Mathematics to Secondary School Students – Why and How,” European Journal of STEM Education, vol. 6, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.20897/ejsteme/10895.
L. K. Fryer, A. Shum, R. B. King, and P. Lau, “How does interest in a course interact with course learning?,” Learn. Instr., vol. 98, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102106.
I. H. Sarah and R. Frank, “Scaffolding of learning activities: Aptitude-treatment-interaction effects in math?,” Learn. Instr., vol. 99, p. 102177, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.LEARNINSTRUC.2025.102177.
M. A. Shabur and M. R. Siddiki, “Investigating social media’s impact on the new era of interactive learning: A case study of Bangladesh,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 4, p. e26234, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.HELIYON.2024.E26234.
R. Ariyanti, E. Rosalina, and T. G. Satria, “Pengembangan Media Smart Board Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Di Kelas III SD,” Edu Cendikia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 88–94, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.47709/educendikia.v1i3.1147.
R. Wahyuni and H. A. Nasution, “Penggunaan Media Papan Pintar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Peserta Didik SD,” ALGORITMA: Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 165–175, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.15408/ajme.v6i2.42756.
A. J. Naziyatul, M. Sari Dewi, and I. Ratih Sulistiani, “Pengaruh Media Pembelajaran Papan Pintar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika Kelas II SD Brawijaya Smart School Malang,” JPMI: Jurnal Pendidikan Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, vol. 6, no. 2, 2024, [Online]. Available: http://riset.unisma.ac.id/index.php/JPMI/index
A. Miranda Purba, R. Destini, and U. Barus, “Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Papan Pintar Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika Kelas II Di SD Swasta Bunga Tanjong,” Journal Of Humanities and Social Studies, vol. 2, no. 4, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://humasjournal.my.id/index.php/HJ/index
F. O. Mumpuni and I. Mulyawati, “Development of Smart Board Media on The Ability To Count Addition and Subtraction Materials in Grade II Elementary School Students,” Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 424–435, 2024.
M. Amalia and Niken Ayu Pratiwi, “Pengaruh Media Interaktif Terhadap Minat Belajar Siswa Pada Pembelajaran IPA Kelas 4 SD,” Jurnal Jendela Pendidikan, vol. 4, no. 01, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.57008/jjp.v4i01.689.
Z. Guo and L. K. Fryer, “Personal relevance and interest: exploring the relationships among three types of perceived personal relevance and middle school students’ interest in a math lesson,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 122, p. 102733, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.LINDIF.2025.102733.
J. Jiang, G. Goepel, K. Crolla, and L. K. Fryer, “Impact of extended reality on students’ interest, self-efficacy and performance in architecture education: A mixed-methods research,” Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 62, p. 102744, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.AEI.2024.102744.
H. Pertiwi, A. Aziz, and M. Husni, “Development of Smart Board Visual Media for Autistic Children in Learning Indonesian Language,” Special and Inclusive Education Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, 2023.
N. Cahyati, M. A. Desti, and M. Sari, “Smart Board Live Application: Super Complete Online Learning Platform for Effective Online Learning,” Pancaran Pendidikan, vol. 10, no. 1, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.25037/pancaran.v10i1.284.
Ricardo and I. R. Meilani, “Impak minat dan motivasi belajar terhadap hasil belajar siswa (The impacts of students’ learning interest and motivation on their learning outcomes),” Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 79–92, 2017, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jpmanper/article/view/00000
A. Koçoğlu and S. Kanadlı, “The effect of problem-based learning approach on learning outcomes: A second-order meta-analysis study,” Educ. Res. Rev., p. 100690, May 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.EDUREV.2025.100690.
A. Tusaadia, A. Abdillah, M. Mahsup, V. Mandailina, and S. Syaharuddin, “Learning Independence Towards Mathematics Learning Outcomes Based on Education Level,” Indonesian Journal Of Educational Research and Review, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 577–587, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.23887/ijerr.v5i3.52312.
O. M. A. Aldalalah, “The Effectiveness of Infographic via Interactive Smart Board on enhancing Creative Thinking: A Cognitive Load Perspective,” International Journal of Instruction, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 345–364, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.29333/IJI.2021.14120A.
K. Michael et al., “Understanding and practice of active learning among upper primary school science and mathematics teachers,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 6, p. e16854, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.HELIYON.2023.E16854.
F. Dwi Lestari and A. T. Sultan, “Studi Literatur: Pengaruh Media Digital Pembelajaran Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika,” SCIENCE : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA, vol. 5, no. 2, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://jurnalp4i.com/index.php/science
O. Annisa, F. Auliya, E. Fitriasari, M. Nurunnisa, and A. Marini, “Pengaruh Penggunaan Media Pembelajaran Interaktif Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Di Sekolah Dasar,” JPDSH Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Sosial Humaniora, vol. 2, no. 8, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.53625/jpdsh.v2i8.5765.
Nursella, “Pengaruh Penggunaan Media Pembelajaran Interaktif Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa SD,” EDUCARE: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kesehatan, vol. 2, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.70437/jedu.v2i1.14.
T. W. Apoko and B. Waluyo, “Social media for English language acquisition in Indonesian higher education: Constructivism and connectivism frameworks,” Social Sciences & Humanities Open, vol. 11, p. 101382, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.SSAHO.2025.101382.
H. N. Do, B. N. Do, and M. H. Nguyen, “3How do constructivism learning environments generate better motivation and learning strategies? The Design Science Approach,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 12, p. e22862, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.HELIYON.2023.E22862.
X. Zhang, Y. Ding, X. Huang, W. Li, L. Long, and S. Ding, “Smart Classrooms: How Sensors and AI Are Shaping Educational Paradigms,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 17, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.3390/s24175487.
K. P. Ndwandwe, M. S. Ramaligela, and T. I. Mtshali, “Smartboard enhanced creativity in the technology classroom: lessons on mechanical systems and control,” Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, vol. 30, no. 1, May 2024, doi: 10.21831/jptk.v30i1.72289.
A. Tanır, “German Language Teaching Academicians’ Contentment on the Usage of Smart Board,” Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 182, pp. 259–265, May 2015, doi: 10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2015.04.764.
M. Furkan and U. Kurt, “The Effect of Using Smart Boards in Science Lessons on Middle School Students’ Attitudes Towards Smartboards and Reflective Thinking Skills,” Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, vol. 16, p. 2021, 2021, doi: 10.29329/epasr.2020.373.2.
J. Engelbrecht and M. C. Borba, “Recent developments in using digital technology in mathematics education,” ZDM - Mathematics Education, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 281–292, May 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11858-023-01530-2.
M. De Vita, L. Verschaffel, and J. Elen, “Towards a better understanding of the potential of interactive whiteboards in stimulating mathematics learning,” Learn. Environ. Res., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 81–107, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10984-017-9241-1.
Y. T. Lin and C. Te Cheng, “Effects of Technology-Enhanced Board Game in Primary Mathematics Education on Students’ Learning Performance,” Applied Sciences (Switzerland), vol. 12, no. 22, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.3390/app122211356.
L. Jaramillo-Mediavilla, A. Basantes-Andrade, M. Cabezas-González, and S. Casillas-Martín, “Impact of Gamification on Motivation and Academic Performance: A Systematic Review,” Educ. Sci. (Basel)., vol. 14, no. 6, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14060639.
Y. K. Türel and T. E. Johnson, “Teachers’ Belief and Use of Interactive Whiteboards for Teaching and Learning,” Educational Technology & Society, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1176–3647, 2022.
A. Semerci and M. K. Aydın, “Examining High School Teachers’ Attitudes towards ICT Use in Education,” International Journal of Progressive Education, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 93–105, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2018.139.7.