Genotypic and Phenotypic Identification of Dermatophytes among Clinical Isolates
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: The prevalence of superficial fungal infections varies based
on environmental and hygienic conditions. Dermatophytes, particularly
Trichophyton rubrum and T. mentagrophytes, are keratinophilic fungi
responsible for the majority of these infections. Their ability to produce
proteases and keratinases active at acidic pH facilitates colonization of
human skin. This is a fundamental mechanism observed in Trichophyton
rubrum and Trichophyton mentagrophytes in establishing superficial
infection.
Methods: A total of 200 clinical samples from patients with suspected
dermatophytosis were examined using potassium hydroxide (KOH) mount
and culture techniques. Culture-positive isolates were further identified
through conventional mycology and molecular methods, including PCR and
sequencing using species-specific ITS2 primers for T. rubrum and T.
mentagrophytes. Clinical profiles, treatment history, and recurrence patterns
were also analyzed.
Results: Among 200 KOH-positive samples, 140 yielded culture-positive
results, of which 60 isolates were identified as dermatophytes. Molecular
identification confirmed 20 isolates as T. rubrum and 40 as T.
mentagrophytes. Clinically, 43.34% of cases were naïve infections, 50%
had ongoing antifungal treatment for 1–2 years (recalcitrant cases), and
6.66% were categorized as reinfections due to recurrence of lesions posttherapy. The mean patient age was 30.02 ± 10.95 years, with a male-tofemale ratio of 2:1.
Conclusion: Trichophyton mentagrophytes was more prevalent than T.
rubrum among dermatophyte-positive cases. The high rate of recalcitrant
and recurrent infections highlights the need for accurate species-level
diagnosis using molecular tools to guide effective antifungal management
strategies.
Downloads
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2025 Shyama Datt, Thakur Datt, Narender Pal Singh

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Ameen M. Epidemiology of superficial fungal infections. Clinics in dermatology. 2010 Mar 1;28(2):197-201.
Abd Elmegeed AS, Ouf SA, Moussa TA, Eltahlawi SM. Dermatophytes and other associated fungi in patients attending to some hospitals in Egypt. Brazilian journal of Microbiology. 2015 Sep;46(3):799-805.
Tiwari TN, Chansouria JP, Dubey NK. Antimycotic potency of some essential oils in the treatment of induced dermatomycosis of an experimental animal. Pharmaceutical biology. 2003 Jan 1;41(5):351-6.
Kaur R, Kashyap B, Bhalla P. Onychomycosis-epidemiology, diagnosis and management. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2008 Apr 1;26(2):108.
Woodfolk JA, Wheatley LM, Piyasena RV, Benjamin DC, Platts-Mills TA. Trichophyton Antigens Associated with IgE Antibodies and Delayed Type Hypersensitivity SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY TO TWO FAMILIES OF SERINE PROTEINASES. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1998 Nov 6;273(45):29489-96.
Wang L, Ma L, Leng W, Liu T, Yu L, Yang J, Yang L, Zhang W, Zhang Q, Dong J, Xue Y. Analysis of the dermatophyte Trichophyton rubrum expressed sequence tags. BMC genomics. 2006 Dec 1;7(1):255.
Hainer BL. Dermatophyte infections. American family physician. 2003 Jan 1;67(1):101-8.
Grzybowski A, Pietrzak K. Robert Remak (1815-1865): Discoverer of the fungal character of dermatophytoses. Clinics in dermatology. 2013 Nov 1;31(6):802-5.
Espinel-Ingroff AV. The origin of mycology. InMedical Mycology in the United States 2003 (pp. 1-9). Springer, Dordrecht.
Davidson, F. D., and D. W. R. Mackenzie. 1984. DNA homology studies in the taxonomy of dermatophytes. J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 2:117–123
Gotz H. Remarks on the Classification of Dermatophytes. InAnnales de la Societe Belge de Medecine Tropicale 1964 (Vol. 44, pp. 693-702).
Sabouraud R (1970) (1864–1938) French dermatologist. JAMA 214(2):363–364.
Gadangi I. Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Dermatophytes. InRecent Trends in Antifungal Agents and Antifungal Therapy 2016 (pp. 237-250). Springer, New Delhi.
Emmons CW. Dermatophytes: natural grouping based on the form of the spores and accessory organs. Archives of Dermatology and Syphilology. 1934 Sep 1;30(3):337-62.
Ajello L. A taxonomic review of the dermatophytes and related species. Sabouraudia. 1968 May 1;6(2):147-59.
Sekhom AS, Funk A. In vitro growth inhibitory studies of phacidin against some dermatophytes, opportunistic and systemic fungi, and yeasts pathogenic on man. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 1977 Jan 1;3(1):95-100.
Sinski JT, Flouras K. A survey of dermatophytes isolated from human patients in the United States from 1979 to 1981 with chronological listings of worldwide incidence of five dermatophytes often isolated in the United States. Mycopathologia. 1984 Mar 1;85(1-2):97-120.
Summerbell RC. Trichophyton, Microsporum, Epidermophyton, and agents of superficial mycoses. InManual of Clinical Microbiology, 10th Edition 2011 Jan 1 (pp. 1919-1942). American Society of Microbiology.
Kanbe T, Suzuki Y, Kamiya A, Mochizuki T, Kawasaki M, Fujihiro M, Kikuchi A. Species-identification of dermatophytes Trichophyton, Microsporum and Epidermophyton by PCR and PCR-RFLP targeting of the DNA topoisomerase II genes. Journal of dermatological science. 2003 Oct 1;33(1):41-54.
Sharma R, Rajak RC, Pandey AK. Teaching techniques for mycology: 19. A micro-dilution drop-trail method for isolating onygenalean ascomycetes from hair baits. Mycologist. 2002 Nov;16(4):153-7.
Dawson CO, Gentles JC. Perfect stage of Keratinomyces ajelloi. Nature. 1959 May 9;183(4671):1345-6.
Shyama Datt