The Labor-Induced Pregnancy Cases In Dr Soetomo General Hospital: A Descriptive Study
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Labor induction is a procedure to stimulate uterine contractions during pregnancy before labor begins on its own to achieve a vaginal birth with medical or mechanical intervention to start the labor. This procedure aims to stimulate more extensive contraction in the uterus. The labor induction can reduce the caesarean rate. Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and misoprostol are the commonest medicine used to ripen the cervix in the Dr. Soetomo Hospital.
Objective: Our study aim to evaluate the success rate of induction of labor patient.
Methods: This study was a descriptive study using the medical record in 2018 in the Dr. Soetomo General Hospital, Surabaya. A total of 183 patient’s medical record data who underwent induced labor were used in this study. Inclusion criteria were the women with indication to deliver and have no cephalo-pelvic disproportion. Women with contraindication labor induction were excluded. Data was described using table and narrative approach.
Results: The most range of gestational age was 21-36 weeks (53.01%) followed by 37-42 weeks (42.07%). There were 68 patients (37,1%) primigravida and 115 patients (62,8%) were multipara. The major induced labor was conducted with misoprostol (78.6%), and the most pelvic scores were 2 (58.46%) before underwent induced labor. Vertex delivery was the preferred mode of delivery after the induction of labor with 89 patients (48,62%). The labor induction failure followed with the caesarean operation were 27 patients (14,7%) and one patient (0,54%) with hysterotomy, most of them caused by failure to progress and fetal distress. There were 78 babies (43%) with the weight over 2500 g, 28 babies (31%) were over 2000 g, and the other was below 2000 g. A total of 84.71% with labor induction can be delivered vaginally, and It is a good number to reduce the rate of caesarean operations.
Conclusion: This study concludes that misoprostol uses for the induction of labor than the other. Delivery abdominal is less percentage than the additional delivery finds that as a failure of induction of labor. The Labor induction success to delivered vaginally can reduce the rate of caesarean operation.
Downloads
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2021 Alfin Firasy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Cunningham, F. G. (2018). Induction and Augmentation of Labor. Williams Obstetrics. 25th edition, 503–511.]
Caughey, A. B. (2012). Post-Term Pregnancy. Dewhurst’s Textbook of Obstetrics & Gynaecology: Eighth Edition, 4(3), 269–286.
Martin, JA, Hamilton, Fetal: Births final data for 2015.Natl Vital Stat Rep 66(1):1,2017
Petrou S, Taher S, Abangma G, Eddama O, Bennett P. BJOG. 2008;118(6):726–34
Carter, S., Channon, A., & Berrington, A. (2020). Socioeconomic risk factors for labour induction in the United Kingdom. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 20(1), 1–13.
Aspar, H., Harun, A. and Sukarsih, S. (2019). Faktor Yang Berhubungan dengan Kejadian Keberhasilan Induksi Persalinan di Rumah Sakit Umum Bahagia Makassar Tahun
JURNAL KESEHATAN DELIMA PELAMONIA, 3(2), pp.111-117.
de Vaan, M. D., ten Eikelder, M. L., Jozwiak, M., Palmer, K. R., DaviesTuck, M., Bloemenkamp, K. W., Mol, B. W. J., & Boulvain, M. (2019). Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Trihastuti, M. P., & Purwaka, B. T. (2015). Pengaruh Pemberian Misoprostol 25 µg Peroral Ambulatoir pada Tenggat Waktu Persalinan Wanita Hamil > 40 Minggu Resiko Rendah. Majalah Obstetri & Ginekologi, 23(1), 1.
Draycott, T., Van Der Nelson, H., Montouchet, C., Ruff, L., & Andersson, F. (2016). Reduction in resource use with the misoprostol vaginal insert vs the dinoprostone vaginal insert for labour induction: A model-based analysis from a United Kingdom healthcare perspective Utilization, expenditure, economics and financing systems. BMC Health Services Research, 16(1), 1–9
Middleton, P., Shepherd, E., Morris, J., Ca, C., Jc, G., Middleton, P., Shepherd, E., Morris, J., Ca, C., & Jc, G. (2020). Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks ’ gestation (Review).
Stock SJ, Ferguson E, Duffy A, Ford I, Chalmers J, Norman JE. Outcomes of elective induction of labour at term compared with expectant management: population based study. BMJ 2012 May;344:e2838.
Jindal, P., Avasthi, K., & Kaur, M. (2011). A comparison of vaginal vs. oral misoprostol for induction of labor-double blind randomized trial. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 61(5), 538–542.
Fisher, S. A., Mackenzie, V. P., & Davies, G. A. L. (2001). Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 185(4), 906–910.
RCOG. (2013). Induction of Labour at Term in Older Mothers: RCOG scientific impact, 34.