##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Muhammad Nawawi Ana Christanti

Abstract

The objective of the research was to promote a new model of designing activities in the lesson plan of English teachers. The model was derived from the phases of the Multiliteracy pedagogical Framework. It was qualitative research with documentation techniques for collecting data. The source of data was the document of lesson plans made by teachers of English. The data was statements on teaching-learning activities in the lesson plans. The author identified the lesson plan of teachers from Al Islam senior high school in Krian, Sidoarjo. The activities statements were categorized using the four phases and cognitive process of the Multiliteracy Framework; Situated Practice (Experiencing), Overt Instruction (Conceptualizing), Critical Framing (Analysis), and Transformed Practice (Applying) promoted by Cope and Kalantzis with New London Group in 1996.  The result showed that the teachers just included two phases; Situated Practice (Experiencing) and Overt Instruction (Conceptualizing), no Overt Instruction (Conceptualizing), Critical Framing (Analysis), and Transformed Practice (Applying) yet in their teaching-learning activities. The teachers should change the old phases in their lesson plan with the four phases of the framework to guide them in applying multiliteracy in English language teaching. The next researcher could focus on teachers’ knowledge or belief about the multiliteracy framework to assure the implementation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Muhammad Nawawi, & Ana Christanti. (2020). Promotıng Multılıteracy Framework - Based Lesson Plan for Englısh Language Teachıng In Senıor Hıgh School. Education and Human Development Journal, 5(2), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.33086/ehdj.v5i2.1549
Section
Articles
Multiliteracy, Framework

References

Allen, H. W., & Negueruela-Azarola, E. (2010). The professional development of future professors of foreign languages: Looking back, looking forward. Modern Language Journal, 94(3), 377–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01056.x
Cazden, Courtney; Cope, Bill; Fairclough, Norman; Gee, J. et al. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures (Vol. 66). https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
Cazden, C.. (2006). Review of the books Language policies and language education: The impact in East Asian countries in the next decade and English language teaching in East Asia today: Changing policies and practices. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 26, 120–122.
Cruickshank, Jenkin, D.B., & M. K. (2006). The Act of Teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.
Gee, J.. (2004). Game-like situated learning: An example of situated learning and implications for an opportunity to learn. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin
Jordan, E. T. (2011). A Place for Video Games: A Theoretical and Pedagogical Framework for Multiliteracies Learning in English Studies (Michigan Technological University). Retrieved from https://ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED533886&scope=site%5Cnhttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqdiss&rft_dat
Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2005). Learning by design. Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Schools Innovation Commission.
Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2008). New learning: Elements of a science of education. Victoria, Australia: Cambridge University Press.
Kemendikbud. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan No 22 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Indonesia.
Kemendikbud. (2019). Surat Edaran Nomor 14 Tahun 2019 Tentang Penyederhanaan Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran.
Kern, R. (2000). Literacy and Language Teaching. In Oxford University Press (Vol. 57). https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.1.79
Khairi, A., Retnaningdyah, P., & Aswandi, M. (2018). Revealing Multiliteracies in English as a Foreign Language Classroom. Advances in Social Science, Education, and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 108(SoSHEC 2017), 140–145. https://doi.org/10.2991/soshec-17.2018.28
Luke, A., Comber, B., & Grant, H. (2003). Critical Literacies and Cultural Studies. (Vol. 2). The literacy lexicon. French Forest: NSW.
Rao, K., & Meo, G. (2016). Using Universal Design for Learning to Design Standards-Based Lessons. SAGE Open, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016680688
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Muhammad Nawawi, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sidoarjo

Ana Christanti