##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

ID Hawwin Fitra Raharja ID Tri Marhaeni Pudji Astuti ID Hamdan Tri Atmaja ID Puji Lestari MY Novel Anak Lyndon

Abstract

Social media has become an important environment in which students encounter, reproduce, and negotiate social meanings and standards of recognition, complicating understandings of identity formation in social studies education. This study examines the social construction of student identity crisis, conceptualized as a broader condition of identity tension, in the context of digital simulacra through the dialectical processes of externalization, objectivation, and internalization. Students’ experiences of flexing (the conspicuous display of status, possessions, or lifestyle) provide the empirical focus, while the implications for social studies education are also considered. An interpretivist qualitative case study was conducted in four junior high schools in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, involving 27 participants: 19 students and eight social studies teachers. Data were generated through four classroom observations, eight student interview sessions (seven group interviews and one individual interview), and one teacher focus group discussion. The data were analyzed thematically through iterative open coding, category development, cross-source comparison, and theoretical mapping. The findings suggest that, across the four schools, student identity tension is constructed through three interconnected processes rather than resulting simply from social media use. Externalization involved digital socialization, immediate social reinforcement, and mimetic digital practices. Objectivation involved the repeated visibility of platform-mediated representations, the normalization of digital standards, and diminished critical questioning. Internalization involved social comparison, self-evaluation, and performative insecurity. Some students also questioned or resisted prevailing digital standards, suggesting a reflective counter-process rather than a universal fourth stage. Conceptually, this study brings Berger and Luckmann’s theory of social construction into dialogue with Baudrillard’s concept of simulacra to explain how digitally circulating representations acquire social legitimacy and personal significance. The findings underscore the relevance of reflective and critical engagement with students’ digital experiences in social studies education, although specific pedagogical approaches were not tested as interventions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Fitra Raharja, H., Marhaeni Pudji Astuti, T., Tri Atmaja, H., Lestari, P., & Anak Lyndon, N. (2026). Social Studies Education Challenges: The Social Construction of Student Identity Crisis Amid Digital Simulacra in Yogyakarta. Education and Human Development Journal, 11(3), 368–385. https://doi.org/10.33086/ehdj.v11i3.9134
Section
Articles
digital simulacra, flexing, social construction, social studies education, student identity crisis

References

[1] A. Adebo, and H. H. Hamsan. “Identity Exploration of University Students in the Somatic and Material Domains: The Mediating Role of Conspicuous Consumption.” In: Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research 42.4 ( 2023), pp. 1716–1735. doi: 10.1108/agjsr-05-2023-0220.

[2] S. Campbell, and N. Wallace. “‘Scientists Like Me’: Using Culturally Relevant Information Literacy Instruction to Foster Student STEM Identity.” In: Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 105 ( 2024)doi: 10.29173/istl2814.

[3] A. I. Hadžiomerović. “Conceptualizing Adult Identity Formation in Higher Education Context.” In: Obrazovanje Odraslih/Adult Education 20.1_2 2020 ( 2021), pp. 37–56. doi: 10.53617/issn2744-2047.2020.20.1_2.37.

[4] C. Rios‐Aguilar, B. WRIGHT, and D. Vo. “Repackaging the Work: A Funds of Labor Identity Approach to Understanding People’s Labor Histories / Reempaquetando El Trabajo: Un Enfoque Desde Los Fondos De Identidad Laboral Para Comprender El Historial Laboral De Las Personas.” In: Studies in Psychology Estudios De Psicología 46.1–3 ( 2025), pp. 290–326. doi: 10.1177/02109395251396926.

[5] F. D. Lise, K. Luyckx, and E. Crocetti. “Identity Matters for Well-Being: The Longitudinal Associations Between Identity Processes and Well-Being in Adolescents With Different Cultural Backgrounds.” In: Journal of Youth and Adolescence 53.4 ( 2023), pp. 910–926. doi: 10.1007/s10964-023-01901-8.

[6] L. Meerts-Brandsma, T. N. Melton, and J. Sibthorp. “Experiential Education Programs: Fertile Environments for Identity Formation.” In: Journal of Experiential Education 46.4 ( 2023), pp. 412–432. doi: 10.1177/10538259221146724.

[7] S. Karoso. “Transformation of Cultural Arts Education in Indonesia: Combining Technological Innovation and Adaptability in the Era of Globalisation.” In: Education and Human Development Journal 9.1 (April 2024), pp. 31–39. doi: 10.33086/ehdj.v9i1.5673.

[8] P. L. Berger, and T. Luckmann. “The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge.” Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1966.

[9] Mohammed Abdel Karim Al Hourani. “Covid-19 and the Social Construction of Reality in Jordan.” In: Comparative Sociology 20.6 ( 2021), pp. 718–740. doi: 10.1163/15691330-bja10045.

[10] Z. Fadlilah, and N. Khasanah. “Proses sosialisasi anak di sekolah: Dari bangku kelas hingga lingkungan pergaulan.” In: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam 2.2 ( 2025).

[11] I. Kuswandi, and A. Yasid. “The Religion-Based Fun School Model Perspective of Peter L. Berger: (Studies at MIN 2 and SDK Sang Timur Sumenep).” In: Educare Journal of Primary Education 3.2 ( 2022), pp. 175–196. doi: 10.35719/educare.v3i2.123.

[12] J. Baudrillard. “Simulacra and Simulation.” Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1994.

[13] A. Gemović. “When the Screens Go Off: The Apocalypse of Hyperreality in Don DeLillo’s The Silence.” In: Belgrade English Language and Literature Studies 14 ( 2022), pp. 181–200. doi: 10.18485/bells.2022.14.8.

[14] T. Todorović, L. Janeš, and V. Novaković. “Aesthetics, Psyche and Media: A Manifold of Mimesis in the Age of Simulation.” In: Conatus 7.2 ( 2022), pp. 119–141. doi: 10.12681/cjp.31690.

[15] F. Chaudhary, and S. A. Zahid. “The Interplay of Simulacrum, Hyper-Reality and Distorted Identity in Hamid’s Fiction: A Postmodern Paradigm.” In: International Journal of Linguistics and Culture 2.2 ( 2021), pp. 117–134. doi: 10.52700/ijlc.v2i2.44.

[16] M. M. A. Shaheen, S. A. Saeed, and A. Naeem. “Dystopic Simulacra, Virtual Identities and Cultural Implosion in Shteyngart’s Super Sad True Love Story.” In: Global Sociological Review VII.I ( 2022), pp. 116–124. doi: 10.31703/gsr.2022(vii-i).12.

[17] M. F. Christanti, P. B. Mardani, I. P. Cahyani, and W. Y. Sembada. “‘Instagramable’ : Simulation, Simulacra and Hyperreality on Instagram Post.” In: International Journal of Social Service and Research 1.4 ( 2021), pp. 394–401. doi: 10.46799/ijssr.v1i4.59.

[18] J. Wang. “Application of Goffman’s Theory of Dramaturgy and Baudrillard’s Concepts of Simulacrum and Simulation in the Metaverse.” In: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media 11.1 ( 2023), pp. 319–327. doi: 10.54254/2753-7048/11/20230764.

[19] H. D. Karci. “The University Students’ Awareness of Hyperreality on Social Media and Problematic Social Media Usage: A Qualitative Study.” In: Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 49 ( 2022), pp. 300–314. doi: 10.52642/susbed.1162290.

[20] S. Pohan, and M. A. H. Lbs. “Use of Anonymous Social Media Accounts as Self-Disclosure Media for Generation Z on Postmodernism.” In: Bricolage Jurnal Magister Ilmu Komunikasi 8.2 ( 2022), pp. 163. doi: 10.30813/bricolage.v8i2.3351.

[21] R. Sternszus, Y. Steinert, S. Razack, J. D. Boudreau, L. Snell, and R. L. Cruess. “Being, Becoming, and Belonging: Reconceptualizing Professional Identity Formation in Medicine.” In: Frontiers in Medicine 11 ( 2024)doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1438082.

[22] J. Chandras. “Digital Storytelling as Pedagogy in Linguistic Anthropology.” In: Teaching Anthropology 10.3 ( 2021), pp. 90–96. doi: 10.22582/ta.v11i3.629.

[23] S. Gilpin, S. R. Yoon, and J. Lazzara. “Building Open Pedagogy in Community Colleges.” In: Online Learning 27.4 ( 2023)doi: 10.24059/olj.v27i4.4031.

[24] T. Varga‐Atkins. “Disciplinary Digital Capabilities of Professionals.” In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Networked Learning 12 ( 2024), pp. 164–174. doi: 10.54337/nlc.v12.8652.

[25] R. R. Wright. “The Way Forward: Adult Educators Combating Mis/Disinformation via Formal and Informal Education.” In: New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 2023.178 ( 2023), pp. 119–130. doi: 10.1002/ace.20491.

[26] Radivan Bagas Kusuma and Joko Sutarto. “Implementing Computer-Based National Assessment in the Package C Equivalency Program: A Case Study of PKBM Tunas Mekar, Cilacap Regency.” In: Education and Human Development Journal 10.3 (November 2025), pp. 287–301. doi: 10.33086/ehdj.v10i3.8160.

[27] S. Glasdam, J. W. Jørgensen, and S. Stjernswärd. “Socialising of Nursing Students Into Homecare Practice in Denmark: A Berger and Luckmann-Inspired Interview Study.” In: Nordic Journal of Nursing Research 43.1 ( 2021)doi: 10.1177/20571585211052752.

[28] M. Huda. “Strengthening Religious Moderation Through the Core Values of Islamic Boarding School Education.” In: Al-Hayat Journal of Islamic Education 8.1 ( 2024), pp. 59. doi: 10.35723/ajie.v8i1.458.

[29] J. Sørensen, M. Holen, I. S. Jakobsen, P. Larsen, and D. S. Nielsen. “Clinical Supervisors’ and Educators’ Perspectives on Conditions Forming Nursing Students’ Professional Identity: A Qualitative Focus Group Study.” In: Nursing Inquiry 32.4 ( 2025)doi: 10.1111/nin.70054.

[30] A. Tong, P. Sainsbury, and J. Craig. “Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.” In: International Journal for Quality in Health Care 19.6 ( 2007), pp. 349–357. .

[31] A. Vaičiūnienė, and A. Kazlauskienė. “Manifestation of Social Constructionism in the Process of Teaching and Learning.” In: Technium Social Sciences Journal 33 ( 2022), pp. 217–226. doi: 10.47577/tssj.v33i1.6786.

[32] F. Pires, M.-J. Masanet, J. M. Tomasena, and C. A. Scolari. “Learning With YouTube: Beyond Formal and Informal Through New Actors, Strategies and Affordances.” In: Convergence the International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies 28.3 ( 2022), pp. 838–853. doi: 10.1177/13548565211020545.

[33] O. N. Park, and E. Oh. “Building Public Libraries for Teens Through Community Engagement: A Case Study of a Public Library in South Korea.” In: Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science 45.2 ( 2023), pp. 1–23. doi: 10.5206/cjils-rcsib.v45i2.15064.

[34] R. Hobbs. “‘A Most Mischievous Word’: Neil Postman’s Approach to Propaganda Education.” In: HKS Misinfo Review ( 2021)doi: 10.37016/mr-2020-65.

[35] R. T. Knowles, S. P. Camicia, and L. K. Nelson. “Education for Democracy in the Social Media Century.” In: Research in Social Sciences and Technology 8.2 ( 2023), pp. 21–36. doi: 10.46303/ressat.2023.9.

[36] Z. Volčić, M. Andrejevic, I. Mahoney, and F. Gehren. “No Media Literacy Without Civic Literacy.” In: Citizenship Social and Economics Education 25.2 ( 2025), pp. 156–177. doi: 10.1177/14788047251398810.

[37] P. Freire. “Pedagogy of the Oppressed.” New York, NY: The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc, 2000.

[38] D. McDaniel. “Toward Culturally Digitized Pedagogy: Informing Theory, Research, and Practice.” In: Reading Research Quarterly 59.2 ( 2024), pp. 193–210. doi: 10.1002/rrq.534.

Hawwin Fitra Raharja, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Universitas Hasyim Asy’ari

Tri Marhaeni Pudji Astuti, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Hamdan Tri Atmaja, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Puji Lestari, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Novel Anak Lyndon, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor