##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

ID Didit Yulian Kasdriyanto ID Ribut Prastiwi Sriwijayanti ID Tamam Asrori ID Ludfi Arya Wardana MM Win Phyu Thwe

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a valid, practical, and effective Collaborative Digital Learning–Augmented Reality (CoDL-AR) instructional design to improve digital literacy in primary science education. The study employed a research and development (R&D) method adapted from the Dick and Carey model, involving preliminary analysis, instructional design, product development, expert validation, limited an extensive trials, and effectiveness testing. The participants consisted of 192 fifth-grade students from four elementary schools in Probolinggo Regency, Indonesia. Data were collected using validation sheets, observation sheets, practicality questionnaires, and digital literacy tests covering seven indicators: digital device operation, information access, information evaluation, digital communication and collaboration, digital creativity, digital ethics, and digital security. The results showed that the CoDL-AR instructional design achieved highly valid categories in content and construct validation. The findings demonstrated that the instructional model exhibited a high degree of practicality and satisfactory reliability across all instructional phases. Furthermore, the effectiveness analysis revealed significant improvements in students’ digital literacy, supported by medium to high N-Gain scores and significant paired-samples t-test results (p < 0.05). Therefore, the CoDL-AR instructional design effectively enhances digital literacy and supports meaningful science learning experiences in primary education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Yulian Kasdriyanto, D., Prastiwi Sriwijayanti, R., Asrori, T., Arya Wardana, L., & Phyu Thwe, W. (2026). Collaborative Digital Learning-Augmented Reality Instructional Design to Improve Digital Literacy in Science Education at Primary Schools. Education and Human Development Journal, 11(3), 353–367. https://doi.org/10.33086/ehdj.v11i3.8903
Section
Articles
Augmented Reality, Collaborative Learning, Digital Literacy, Instructional Design, Primary Science Education

References

[1] M. S. Abtahi. “Interactive Multimedia Learning Object (IMLO) for Dyslexic Children”. In: Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 47 (2012), pp. 1206–1210. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.801.

[2] R. Atkins, A. J. Turner, T. Chandola, and M. Sutton. “Going Beyond the Mean in Examining Relationships of Adolescent Non-Cognitive Skills with Health-Related Quality of Life and Biomarkers in Later-Life”. In: Economics & Human Biology 39 (2020), p. 100923. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100923.

[3] K. Chachil, A. Engkamat, A. Sarkawi, and A. R. A. Shuib. “Interactive Multimedia-Based Mobile Application for Learning Iban Language (I-MMAPS for Learning Iban Language)”. In: Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 167 (2015), pp. 267–273. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.673.

[4] M. Camiré, K. Kendellen, S. Rathwell, and S. Turgeon. “Evaluating the Coaching for Life Skills Online Training Program: A Randomised Controlled Trial”. In: Psychology of Sport and Exercise 48 (2020), p. 101649. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101649.

[5] A. Aydınlar et al. “Awareness and Level of Digital Literacy among Students Receiving Health-Based Education”. In: BMC Medical Education 24.1 (2024), pp. 1–13. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05025-w.

[6] A. Brailas, S. M. Avani, C. Gkini, M. A. Deilogkou, K. Koskinas, and G. Alexias. “Experiential Learning in Action: A Collaborative Inquiry”. In: The Qualitative Report 22.1 (2017), pp. 271–288. doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2551.

[7] S. Rahmawati, A. G. Abdullah, and I. Widiaty. “Teachers’ Digital Literacy Overview in Secondary School”. In: International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education 13.1 (2024), pp. 597–606. doi: 10.11591/ijere.v13i1.25747.

[8] F. M. A. Khan and M. Masood. “The Effectiveness of an Interactive Multimedia Courseware with Cooperative Mastery Approach in Enhancing Higher Order Thinking Skills in Learning Cellular Respiration”. In: Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 176 (2015), pp. 977–984. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.567.

[9] M. Kesim and Y. Ozarslan. “Augmented Reality in Education: Current Technologies and the Potential for Education”. In: Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 47 (2012), pp. 297–302. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.654.

[10] T. Jeřábek, V. Rambousek, and R. Wildová. “Specifics of Visual Perception of the Augmented Reality in the Context of Education”. In: Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 159 (2014), pp. 598–604. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.432.

[11] D. Nincarean, M. B. Alia, N. D. A. Halim, and M. H. A. Rahman. “Mobile Augmented Reality: The Potential for Education”. In: Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 103 (2013), pp. 657–664. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.385.

[12] K. D. Ningrum, E. Utomo, A. Marini, and B. Setiawan. “Media Komik Elektronik Terintegrasi Augmented Reality dalam Pembelajaran Sistem Peredaran Darah Manusia di Sekolah Dasar”. In: Jurnal Basicedu 6.1 (2022), pp. 1297–1310. doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v6i1.2289.

[13] A. Z. Rahman, T. N. Hidayat, and I. Yanuttama. “Media Pembelajaran IPA Kelas 3 Sekolah Dasar Menggunakan Teknologi Augmented Reality Berbasis Android”. In: Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi dan Multimedia. Vol. 5. 1. 2017, pp. 4-6–43. url: http://ojs.amikom.ac.id/index.php/semnasteknomedia/article/view/1797.

[14] A. Bin Tomi and D. R. A. Rambli. “An Interactive Mobile Augmented Reality Magical Playbook: Learning Number with the Thirsty Crow”. In: Procedia Computer Science 25 (2013), pp. 123–130. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2013.11.015.

[15] R. M. Oikarinen, J. K. Oikarinen, S. Havu-Nuutinen, and S. Pöntinen. “Students’ Collaboration in Technology-Enhanced Reciprocal Peer Tutoring as an Approach towards Learning Mathematics”. In: Education and Information Technologies (2022). doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10799-3.

[16] T. W. Sesinyi and N. Gcelu. “Exploring Collaborative Strategies Used by School Management Teams to Sustain Parental Involvement in Xhariep District Schools”. In: Perspectives in Education (2023). doi: 10.38140/pie.v41i4.7102.

[17] K. Mänty, H. Järvenoja, and T. Törmänen. “Socio-Emotional Interaction in Collaborative Learning: Combining Individual Emotional Experiences and Group-Level Emotion Regulation”. In: International Journal of Educational Research 102 (2020), p. 101589. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101589.

[18] M. R. Mubaraq, H. Kurniawan, and A. Saleh. “Implementasi Augmented Reality pada Media Pembelajaran Buah-Buahan Berbasis Android”. In: IT (Informatic Tech Journal) 6.1 (2018), pp. 89–98. doi: 10.22303/it.6.1.2018.89-98.

[19] S. A. Yoon, K. Elinich, J. Wang, C. Steinmeier, and S. Tucker. “Using Augmented Reality and Knowledge-Building Scaffolds to Improve Learning in a Science Museum”. In: International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 7 (2012), pp. 519–541. doi: 10.1007/s11412-012-9156-x.

[20] A. Kurniawan and H. Fadhilah. “Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi dalam Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar di Era Digital”. In: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar 11.2 (2020), pp. 101–109. doi: 10.1234/jpd.v11i2.1234.

[21] A. K. Bawaneh and M. M. Moubarak. “Barriers and Challenges of Using Augmented Reality in Education”. In: Education and Information Technologies 26 (2021), pp. 5121–5144. doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10559-2.

[22] W. Dick and L. Carey. The Systematic Design of Instruction. Illinois: Addison Wesley, 2001.

[23] A. Smit, J. Swart, and M. Broersma. “Bypassing Digital Literacy: Marginalized Citizens’ Tactics for Participation and Inclusion in Digital Societies”. In: New Media & Society (2024). doi: 10.1177/14614448231220383.

[24] Richard I. Arend. Learning to Teach. Vol. 13. 1. McGraw-Hill, 2012.

[25] G. D. Borich. Effective Teaching Methods: Research-Based Practice. 8th ed. Pearson Education, 2014.

[26] R. R. Hake. “Interactive Engagement Versus Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses”. In: American Journal of Physics 66.1 (1998), pp. 64–74.

[27] M. Ekici and M. Erdem. “Developing Science Process Skills through Mobile Scientific Inquiry”. In: Thinking Skills and Creativity 36 (2020), p. 100658. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100658.

[28] L. Molefe and S. Hobden. “Exploring Student Teachers’ Views of Science Process Skills in Their Initial Teacher Education Programmes”. In: South African Journal of Education 36.3 (2016), pp. 1–12. doi: 10.15700/saje.v36n3a1279.

[29] T. Borodina, A. Sibgatullina, and A. Gizatullina. “Developing Creative Thinking in Future Teachers as a Topical Issue of Higher Education”. In: Journal of Social Studies Education Research 10.4 (2019), pp. 226–245.

[30] B. Joyce and M. Weil. Models of Teaching. 10th ed. Pearson Education, 2020. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

[31] T. Plomp and N. Nieveen. Educational Design Research: An Introduction. Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development (SLO), 2013.

[32] J. Dewey. “Experience and Education”. In: The Educational Forum 50.3 (1986), pp. 241–252.

[33] H. Olmedo. “Virtuality Continuum’s State of the Art”. In: Procedia Computer Science 25 (2013), pp. 261–270. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2013.11.032.

[34] Z. Humienny and M. Berta. “Interactive Multimedia Learning Environment for Geometrical Specification Indication and Verification Rules”. In: Procedia CIRP 75 (2018), pp. 161–166. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.332.

[35] L. A. Wardana, R. Nuriyanti, F. S. Athilah, et al. “Lifeskill-Based Interactive Multimedia Training and Assistance to Improve Education Services at SDN Gondang Wetan 1 Pasuruan”. In: Gandrung 3.2 (2022), pp. 524–529. url: http://ejournal.unibabwi.ac.id/index.php/gandrung/article/view/2050.

[36] R. J. Sternberg et al. “Testing the Theory of Successful Intelligence in Teaching Grade 4 Language Arts, Mathematics, and Science”. In: Journal of Educational Psychology 106.3 (2014), pp. 881–899. doi: 10.1037/a0035833.

[37] S. M. Castillo, C. I. A. Olivera, and L. E. P. Enrique. “Collaboration: Essential Component to Learning Assessment to Career Information Sciences”. In: Revista Conrado 14.62 (2018), pp. 205–211.

[38] E. Ismail and L. Chittle. “Transferable Teaching Skills among Student Workshop Facilitators”. In: XIII (2020).

[39] B. Xu, J. M. Stephens, and K. Lee. “Assessing Student Engagement in Collaborative Learning: Development and Validation of New Measure in China”. In: The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 33.2 (2023), pp. 395–405. doi: 10.1007/s40299-023-00737-x.

[40] I. M. Satyawan, I. W. Lasmawan, I. W. Artanayasa, I. K. I. Swadesi, and I. K. Yoda. “The Development of Interactive Multimedia in E-Learning Undiksha to Improve Soccer Learning Outcomes in FOK Undiksha”. In: Journal of Physical Education and Sport 23.12 (2023), pp. 3468–3477. doi: 10.7752/jpes.2023.12398.

[41] S. Suryanti et al. “Ethnoscience-Based Science Learning in Elementary Schools”. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1987.1 (2021). doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1987/1/012055.

Didit Yulian Kasdriyanto, Department Elementary School Teacher Education, Universitas Panca Marga, Indonesia

Ribut Prastiwi Sriwijayanti, Department of Civic Education, Universitas Panca Marga

Tamam Asrori, Department Computer Science, Universitas Panca Marga

Ludfi Arya Wardana, Department Elementary School Teacher Education, Universitas Panca Marga

Win Phyu Thwe, Pyay Education Degree College, Myanmar