Improving EFL Learners’ Affective Skills Through the Use of Digital Game-Based Learning
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Sri Wahyuni
Nico Irawan
Abd Ghofur
Agung Pramujiono
Abstract
This research explores how digital game-based learning models work in EFL classrooms to develop affective competencies among learners and evaluates their effectiveness. The research also investigates the obstacles that emerged during its execution. The main objective of the game-based intervention was to develop affective competencies among students during their English language learning process. The research used classroom action research to study 36 high school students in Surabaya through interviews and questionnaires. The research shows that digital games in classroom teaching boost student affective engagement while making learning more enjoyable and motivating. The research indicates that game selection remains challenging because it requires matching games to instructional targets, and teachers need specialized training to execute the approach effectively. The research findings offer essential knowledge to educational institutions and teachers about digital games as tools to enhance emotional student involvement in language education and improve academic quality.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Copyright (c) 2025 Sri Wahyuni, Nico Irawan, Abd Ghofur, Agung Pramujiono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Benz, A., Gerhard, J., Stalnaker, R., Asher, N., Williams, M., & Benz, A. (2006). Game Theory and Pragmatics. Game Theory and Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230285897
Bergsteiner, H., Avery, G. C., & Neumann, R. (2010). Kolb’s experiential learning model: Critique from a modelling perspective. Studies in Continuing Education, 32(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/01580370903534355
Cain, T. (2011). Teachers’ classroom-based action research. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 34(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2011.552307
Carr, R., Palmer, S., & Hagel, P. (2015). Active learning: The importance of developing a comprehensive measure. Active Learning in Higher Education, 16(3), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787415589529
Cazan, A. M. (2012). Enhancing self-regulated learning by learning journals. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 33, 413–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.154
Christ, T., Arya, P., & Chiu, M. M. (2017). Video use in teacher education: An international survey of practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.12.005
Davies, A., & Elder, C. (2004). The Handbook of Applied Linguistics, Blackwell Publishing, Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics. Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics, 17, 866.
Eardley, A., & Uden, L. (2010). Innovative knowledge management: Concepts for organizational creativity and collaborative design. In Innovative Knowledge Management: Concepts for Organizational Creativity and Collaborative Design. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-701-0
Edwards, E., & Burns, A. (2016). Action research to support teachers’ classroom materials development. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 106–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2015.1090995
Eisenlauer, V. (2020). The EFL-YouTube remix: Empowering multimodal and computational literacies for EFL purposes. Journal of Visual Literacy, 39(3–4), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2020.1826220
Farid, A., & Lamb, M. (2020). English for Da’wah? L2 motivation in Indonesian pesantren schools. System, 94, 102310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102310
Gade, S. (2012). Teacher-researcher collaboration in a Grade Four mathematics classroom: Restoring equality to students’ usage of the “=” sign. Educational Action Research, 20(4), 553–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2012.727644
Gong, D., Yang, H. H., & Cai, J. (2020). Exploring the key influencing factors on college students’ computational thinking skills through flipped-classroom instruction.
Hua, Z., & Gao, X. (2021). Language, culture, and curriculum: lived intercultural experience of international students. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 34(4), 458–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2020.1871003
Irawan, N. (2021). Does Online Learning Work for International Students? Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Conference on Social Science and Humanities (ANCOSH 2020), 542 (Ancosh 2020), 366–370. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210413.085
Irawan, N., Retnaningdyah, P., & Mustofa, A. (2021). Children’s multilingual literacy: Fostering childhood literacy in home and community settings. International Review of Education, 67(5), 719–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-021-09918-6
Kafai, Y. B. (2006). Playing and making games for learning: Instructionist and constructionist perspectives for game studies. Games and Culture, 1(1), 36–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412005281767
Kafai, Y. B., Andrews, M., Boctor, L., Smid, D., Tatar, S., Prensky, M., Kula, S. S., Gee, J. P., Cheng, H. N. H., Liao, C. C. Y., Chang, W.-C., Syafii, M. L., Kusnawan, W., Syukroni, A., Mulyati, Y. F., Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., Nixon, R., Wu, M. L., … Yuberti. (2018). Teori Pembelajaran Dan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Dalam Pendidikan. Language and Intercultural Communication, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.61425/wplp.2015.09.41.57
Kecskes, I., & Horn, L. R. (2008). Explorations in pragmatics: Linguistic, cognitive and intercultural aspects. In Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive and Intercultural Aspects.
Kember, D. (2005). Action learning and action research: Improving the quality of teaching & learning.
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The Action Research Planner, 3rd edn. In Springer.
Kim, Y. S. G., Yang, D., Reyes, M., & Connor, C. (2021). Writing instruction improves students’ writing skills differentially depending on focal instruction and children: A meta-analysis for primary grade students. Educational Research Review, 34(September), 100408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100408
Koosha, M., & Yakhabi, M. (2012). Problems associated with the use of communicative language teaching in EFL contexts and possible solutions. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 1(2), 63–76.
Lambertz-Berndt, M. (2020). Communicating social identities in the classroom. Communication Teacher, 34(4), 305–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2020.1727542
Lappin, S. (2021). Deep Learning and Linguistic Representation. In Deep Learning and Linguistic Representation. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003127086
Lutovac, S., & Assunção Flores, M. (2021). ‘Those who fail should not be teachers’: Pre-service Teachers’ Understandings of Failure and Teacher Identity Development. Journal of Education for Teaching, 47(3), 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.1891833
McDaniel, M. A., & Schlager, M. S. (1990). Discovery Learning and Transfer of Problem-Solving Skills. Cognition and Instruction, 7(2), 129–159. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0702_3
McKay, S. L. (2018). English As an International Language: What It Is and What It Means For Pedagogy. RELC Journal, 49(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217738817
Meydanlioglu, A., & Arikan, F. (2014). Effect of Hybrid Learning in Higher Education. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 8(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.4018/jicte.2007040101
Olofsson, A. D., Lindberg, J. O., Fransson, G., Hauge, T. E., Olofsson, A. D., & Lindberg, J. O. (n.d.). Uptake and Use of Digital Technologies in Primary and Secondary Schools – a Thematic Review of Research. 207–225.
Prensky, M. (2001). The Games Generations: How Learners Have Changed. Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 1–26.
Rahimi, M., & Pourshahbaz, S. (2019). English as a Foreign Language Teachers ’ TPACK : Emerging Research and.
Reeve, F., Gallacher, J., & Mayes, T. (1998). Can new technology remove barriers to work‐based learning? Open Learning, 13(3), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268051980130303
Rivera, E. (2017). Flipping the Classroom in Freshman English Library Instruction: A Comparison Study of a Flipped Class Versus a Traditional Lecture Method. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 23(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2016.1244770
Satish, K. V. (2014). The Assimilation of Literature and Culture in Second Language Acquisition and Learning. 2(4), 122–125.
Schostak, J. F. (2006). Interviewing and representation in qualitative research. Open University Press.
Siegel, J. (2018). International Perspectives on Teaching the Four Skills in ELT. In International Perspectives on Teaching the Four Skills in ELT. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63444-9
Soraya, I., Kurnia, F. D., & Slamet, S. (2018). Teachers’ Motivational Strategies Used in Indonesian EFL Islamic University Students. April. https://doi.org/10.2991/iconelt-17.2018.59
Syafii, M. L., Kusnawan, W., & Syukroni, A. (2020). Enhancing Listening Skills Using Games. International Journal on Studies in Education, 2(2), 78–107. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.21
Themelis, S., & Anglia, E. (2021). Critical Reflections on the Language of Neoliberalism in Education: Dangerous Words and Discourses of Possibility.
Valsa, K. (2005). Action Research for Improving Practice. In A SAGE Publication Campany (Vol. 36, Issue 6).
Vangsnes, V. (2009). A dramaturgic perspective: Seeing digital role-plays as drama and theatre. What are the epistemological and pedagogical consequences? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 1, 20–37.
Yardley, S., Teunissen, P. W., & Dornan, T. (2012). Experiential learning: Transforming theory into practice. Medical Teacher, 34(2), 161–164. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.643264
Zoltan Dörnyei. (2003). Questionnaires in Second Language. In Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.